This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
John MacArthur bibliography article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 4 April 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In addition to the sites currently listed in the article, here are two other prominent (non-trivial) reviewers of MacArthur's books:
The above are relevant in showing that some of the books have gotten reviews. They still do not justify keeping this as a separate list, rather than including in the main article. I urge some sense of proportion. DGG ( talk ) 19:42, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
I don't understand your sense of the word "proportion". In proportion to what? You want to see only a certain percentage of his works? So in a "list of all published works of John F. MacArthur", what proportion is appropriate? Are you asking for this to be in proportion to other book lists? So if this article is more developed than others, we should sacrifice comprehensiveness and completeness here while others catch up? With regard to journal articles, who makes the decision as to which 3 or 4 are the "most important"? According to google scholar, all but the most recent of these articles have been cited in other scholarly works. It seems like "published in The Masters Seminary journal" is sufficient notability for inclusion. Maher-shalal-hashbaz ( talk) 13:42, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
There are serious Wikipedia:External links violations (read: linkfarm in in-text links at ) in John MacArthur bibliography#The Master.27s Seminary Journal articles. -- GrapedApe ( talk) 23:00, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
John MacArthur bibliography. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:35, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
John MacArthur bibliography article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 4 April 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In addition to the sites currently listed in the article, here are two other prominent (non-trivial) reviewers of MacArthur's books:
The above are relevant in showing that some of the books have gotten reviews. They still do not justify keeping this as a separate list, rather than including in the main article. I urge some sense of proportion. DGG ( talk ) 19:42, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
I don't understand your sense of the word "proportion". In proportion to what? You want to see only a certain percentage of his works? So in a "list of all published works of John F. MacArthur", what proportion is appropriate? Are you asking for this to be in proportion to other book lists? So if this article is more developed than others, we should sacrifice comprehensiveness and completeness here while others catch up? With regard to journal articles, who makes the decision as to which 3 or 4 are the "most important"? According to google scholar, all but the most recent of these articles have been cited in other scholarly works. It seems like "published in The Masters Seminary journal" is sufficient notability for inclusion. Maher-shalal-hashbaz ( talk) 13:42, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
There are serious Wikipedia:External links violations (read: linkfarm in in-text links at ) in John MacArthur bibliography#The Master.27s Seminary Journal articles. -- GrapedApe ( talk) 23:00, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
John MacArthur bibliography. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:35, 29 January 2016 (UTC)