From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah ( talk) 15:02, 19 September 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Reviewed: St Andrew's Cross, Glasgow
  • Comment: Note that in the peer reviewed article cited - Ramsden et al- the date of Wishart's paper is given incorrectly as 1820

5x expanded by Iainmacintyre ( talk). Self-nominated at 09:09, 9 September 2019 (UTC). reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Hook is good to go. Ergo Sum 20:36, 12 September 2019 (UTC) reply

revert

not clear what this adds to the article, [1], the second part would be ok....Wishart's name is given to one of the two forms of type 2 neurofibromatosis, the Wishart phenotype, which is seen in young people and characterised by multiple rapidly growing cerebral tumours.[19] not the first part of the revert...IMO-- Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 17:44, 14 September 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Ozzie10aaaa: Thanks for those edits. I've restored that second part as above under heading Legacy, which certainly seems appropriate. Papamac ( talk) 19:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah ( talk) 15:02, 19 September 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Reviewed: St Andrew's Cross, Glasgow
  • Comment: Note that in the peer reviewed article cited - Ramsden et al- the date of Wishart's paper is given incorrectly as 1820

5x expanded by Iainmacintyre ( talk). Self-nominated at 09:09, 9 September 2019 (UTC). reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Hook is good to go. Ergo Sum 20:36, 12 September 2019 (UTC) reply

revert

not clear what this adds to the article, [1], the second part would be ok....Wishart's name is given to one of the two forms of type 2 neurofibromatosis, the Wishart phenotype, which is seen in young people and characterised by multiple rapidly growing cerebral tumours.[19] not the first part of the revert...IMO-- Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 17:44, 14 September 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Ozzie10aaaa: Thanks for those edits. I've restored that second part as above under heading Legacy, which certainly seems appropriate. Papamac ( talk) 19:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook