This article was nominated for deletion on 25 April 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Keep, the world needs all its libraries and it needs to know about them. Jmbryant1 ( talk) 23:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
This is what happens when you try citing too many things @ Godsy:. You cited FNNR as the reason for the change. FNNR clearly says: "The most frequent choice is "References"; other articles use "Notes", "Footnotes", or "Works cited" (in diminishing order of popularity) for this material." Actually READ the MOS that you cite instead of looking at the pictures. Second, neither of those is being used as an inline citation. Again, READ the MOS that you cite and learn what an inline citation actually is. Stop skimming multiple MOS's and contradicting yourself. Niteshift36 ( talk) 01:48, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
A general reference is a citation to a reliable source that supports content, but is not linked to any particular piece of material in the article through an inline citation. General references are usually listed at the end of the article in a "References" section, and are usually sorted by the last name of the author or the editor. ... If both cited and uncited references exist, their distinction can be highlighted with separate section named, [FOR EXAMPLE], "References" and "General references".WP:FNNR clarifies that the section headings can also be "Notes" and "References" and shows a picture. I have not "skimm[ed] multiple MOS's and contradict[ed] [my]self".— Godsy( TALK CONT) 02:01, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
@ Godsy: I just wanted to make sure that you've seen these replies. I know you've responded to them already and this has been a conversation between us, but apparently you believe it's important to start each reply with a notification. Niteshift36 ( talk) 17:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
@ Niteshift36: It isn't appropriate to disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point.— Godsy( TALK CONT) 00:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
http://scholar.library.miami.edu/treasure/chapters/chaptr11.html Mathmo Talk 06:40, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Johann Fust Community Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:59, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 25 April 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Keep, the world needs all its libraries and it needs to know about them. Jmbryant1 ( talk) 23:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
This is what happens when you try citing too many things @ Godsy:. You cited FNNR as the reason for the change. FNNR clearly says: "The most frequent choice is "References"; other articles use "Notes", "Footnotes", or "Works cited" (in diminishing order of popularity) for this material." Actually READ the MOS that you cite instead of looking at the pictures. Second, neither of those is being used as an inline citation. Again, READ the MOS that you cite and learn what an inline citation actually is. Stop skimming multiple MOS's and contradicting yourself. Niteshift36 ( talk) 01:48, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
A general reference is a citation to a reliable source that supports content, but is not linked to any particular piece of material in the article through an inline citation. General references are usually listed at the end of the article in a "References" section, and are usually sorted by the last name of the author or the editor. ... If both cited and uncited references exist, their distinction can be highlighted with separate section named, [FOR EXAMPLE], "References" and "General references".WP:FNNR clarifies that the section headings can also be "Notes" and "References" and shows a picture. I have not "skimm[ed] multiple MOS's and contradict[ed] [my]self".— Godsy( TALK CONT) 02:01, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
@ Godsy: I just wanted to make sure that you've seen these replies. I know you've responded to them already and this has been a conversation between us, but apparently you believe it's important to start each reply with a notification. Niteshift36 ( talk) 17:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
@ Niteshift36: It isn't appropriate to disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point.— Godsy( TALK CONT) 00:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
http://scholar.library.miami.edu/treasure/chapters/chaptr11.html Mathmo Talk 06:40, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Johann Fust Community Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:59, 23 April 2017 (UTC)