This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
IMHO, the article has the following flaws - and may someone rectify them:
-- Keimzelle 06:06, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
It could have the name "Reichsgeleitblatt", where "geleit" literally means "escort" (something is accompanied, e.g. some additional explanations to a written work. Although I have to scour the JPFO website for a comprehensive text about the Nazi law analogies, I think that misquoting the name of a law does not show any good manners. -- Keimzelle 15:16, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
"National Weapons Law" would, in German, be called "Nationales Waffengesetz" or something like that. Ahh, I've now found the word: Reichsgesetzblatt [1], which, in a verbatim sense, means "Law Paper of the Reich". So it is very likely that this Reichsgesetzblatt is the government's bulletin to inform people about newly passed laws. -- Keimzelle 21:19, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
Surely I can't be the only one who finds it hilarious that they whine about being labeled hicks while publishing a series called "Gran'pa Jack"...
Brianmgr 17:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC) Which ones are whining? I have no problem with you pointing up our differences by calling me a hick. But please don't call me Shirley.
I'm not whining either, but I wonder how your comments are valuable to any discussion about the Wikipedia page.
Brianmgr 17:37, 15 August 2007 (UTC) It's not valuable at all. It is a matching post for the 'hilarious' comment - also not valuable. My primary purpose was to experiment with entries in a fairly inconspicuous niche on Wikipedia, having only registered a few minutes prior to the entry. You are welcome to remove anything I post - I won't be upset.
I do not know who initially posted the Wiki page for JPFO. The initial article contained some highly misleading statements about JPFO, so I corrected them. It appears that someone has erased my corrections and adapted some of my text to transmit more inaccurate information.
I added additional information about JPFO's products and positions -- that material was also erased.
Given the nature of Wikipedia, it is likely that those who are bent on misleading the public can continuously modify Wiki pages to pursue their agenda.
People who want to know more about JPFO can visit its website and email its webmaster. If you have a specific question about issues relating to "gun control", the relationship of "gun control" laws and policies to genocide and oppression, the analysis of the Second Amendment in the context of human rights, or any of JPFO's educational products, then simply email the webmaster. To reach me in particular, ask the webmaster to relay your query to me, LegalResearcher.
As of July 31, 2007, I will be adding and correcting the information again, supplying links to support the position. It will be interesting to see how long the accurate facts can sustain on the page before the agenda-folks modify or erase it.
LegalResearcher 19:38, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
I wonder what makes people think they can just come to this information and wipe out more than half of a section.
Can someone suggest the best way of mentioning/linkingto their new video production, "The Gang"? (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPMv4PdRcTc , http://www.youtube.com/user/jpfo1776 ) 199.214.24.87 20:40, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
This page is badly in need of updating. After Aaron Zelman's death in 2010, JPFO underwent a prolonged crisis of leadership, membership, and funding. After a lot of hard work it began to revive under new leadership. Unfortunately, the board made a secret deal to sell off JPFO to the Second Amendment Foundation, an organization whose goals differed from those of Aaron and the original JPFO. SAF kept the name, but most of the JPFO core left and founded The Zelman Partisans. None of this history is reflected in the current JPFO page, though sharp eyes may spot an inconsistency or two. I am going to contact TZP leadership about setting up a Wikipedia page. LiberTarHeel ( talk) 21:06, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:08, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
IMHO, the article has the following flaws - and may someone rectify them:
-- Keimzelle 06:06, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
It could have the name "Reichsgeleitblatt", where "geleit" literally means "escort" (something is accompanied, e.g. some additional explanations to a written work. Although I have to scour the JPFO website for a comprehensive text about the Nazi law analogies, I think that misquoting the name of a law does not show any good manners. -- Keimzelle 15:16, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
"National Weapons Law" would, in German, be called "Nationales Waffengesetz" or something like that. Ahh, I've now found the word: Reichsgesetzblatt [1], which, in a verbatim sense, means "Law Paper of the Reich". So it is very likely that this Reichsgesetzblatt is the government's bulletin to inform people about newly passed laws. -- Keimzelle 21:19, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
Surely I can't be the only one who finds it hilarious that they whine about being labeled hicks while publishing a series called "Gran'pa Jack"...
Brianmgr 17:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC) Which ones are whining? I have no problem with you pointing up our differences by calling me a hick. But please don't call me Shirley.
I'm not whining either, but I wonder how your comments are valuable to any discussion about the Wikipedia page.
Brianmgr 17:37, 15 August 2007 (UTC) It's not valuable at all. It is a matching post for the 'hilarious' comment - also not valuable. My primary purpose was to experiment with entries in a fairly inconspicuous niche on Wikipedia, having only registered a few minutes prior to the entry. You are welcome to remove anything I post - I won't be upset.
I do not know who initially posted the Wiki page for JPFO. The initial article contained some highly misleading statements about JPFO, so I corrected them. It appears that someone has erased my corrections and adapted some of my text to transmit more inaccurate information.
I added additional information about JPFO's products and positions -- that material was also erased.
Given the nature of Wikipedia, it is likely that those who are bent on misleading the public can continuously modify Wiki pages to pursue their agenda.
People who want to know more about JPFO can visit its website and email its webmaster. If you have a specific question about issues relating to "gun control", the relationship of "gun control" laws and policies to genocide and oppression, the analysis of the Second Amendment in the context of human rights, or any of JPFO's educational products, then simply email the webmaster. To reach me in particular, ask the webmaster to relay your query to me, LegalResearcher.
As of July 31, 2007, I will be adding and correcting the information again, supplying links to support the position. It will be interesting to see how long the accurate facts can sustain on the page before the agenda-folks modify or erase it.
LegalResearcher 19:38, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
I wonder what makes people think they can just come to this information and wipe out more than half of a section.
Can someone suggest the best way of mentioning/linkingto their new video production, "The Gang"? (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPMv4PdRcTc , http://www.youtube.com/user/jpfo1776 ) 199.214.24.87 20:40, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
This page is badly in need of updating. After Aaron Zelman's death in 2010, JPFO underwent a prolonged crisis of leadership, membership, and funding. After a lot of hard work it began to revive under new leadership. Unfortunately, the board made a secret deal to sell off JPFO to the Second Amendment Foundation, an organization whose goals differed from those of Aaron and the original JPFO. SAF kept the name, but most of the JPFO core left and founded The Zelman Partisans. None of this history is reflected in the current JPFO page, though sharp eyes may spot an inconsistency or two. I am going to contact TZP leadership about setting up a Wikipedia page. LiberTarHeel ( talk) 21:06, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:08, 10 December 2017 (UTC)