This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Jeremy Heywood article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A news item involving Jeremy Heywood was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 4 November 2018. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Should this be included? I'm a mere pleb, but feel it may become an interesting story later in the week: Daily Mail article below reads: The role of Britain’s top mandarin in promoting the controversial £28billion takeover of the defence giant BAE by a European rival was last night under the spotlight. Cabinet Secretary Sir Jeremy Heywood has helped persuade David Cameron to back the plans to join BAE Systems with EADS. But he faces questions about his own role – and whether it constitutes a conflict of interest because he worked for three years at merchant bank Morgan Stanley, which stands to gain tens of millions from brokering the merger.
< http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2207611/BAE-deal-Conflict-fears-David-Camerons-right-hand-mandarin-Sir-Jeremy-Heywood.html#ixzz27L2GFkz8> 212.139.111.220 ( talk) 23:26, 23 September 2012 (UTC)pleb 212.139.111.220 ( talk) 23:26, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
according to DM of 24/09/2012, he's been asked to investigate the matter < http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2207371/Cabinet-Secretary-Sir-Jeremy-Heywood-asked-investigate-minister-Andrew-Mitchell-really-did-police-officers-plebs-told-bike.html> — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.139.111.220 ( talk) 23:46, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jeremy Heywood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:36, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
I suspect most readers will assume it's Whitehall. But the article says "Baron Heywood of Whitehall, of Glossop in the County of Derbyshire". But there is no article for Whitehall, Glossop. Should it be at least added to the "Places" section at Whitehall (disambiguation)? Martinevans123 ( talk) 12:59, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Earlier today, @
Sandstein:
removed the following passage, with the edit summary this is not about Heywood, but about Brexit
:
Heywood said in a blog that the "civil service did its job" and was "scrupulous" during the referendum, producing work "as we should, at pace and with accuracy". It comes after officials were accused by Eurosceptics of promoting
"Project Fear" during the EU referendum in a bid to keep Britain in the European Union.
Iain Duncan Smith said: "There was huge pressure from Government and lines got blurred and broken. "But after purdah [which restricted civil servants] there was no question that the civil service was more comfortable being able to say no." Heywood also admitted that the civil service will have to "go up a gear or two" as it seeks to unwind decades worth of EU laws and regulations.
Later, @ 81.129.228.25: [ https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Jeremy_Heywood&diff=prev&oldid=867299515 restored the passage with the edit summary "restore sourced content, perfectly relevant, take to Talk page", which I'm doing now. My personal view is that whilst 81.129.228.25 is right that the material is sourced, Sandstein is right that it's about Brexit rather than Heywood; so I'm happy to be in a consensus against inclusion of the paragraph. Ralbegen ( talk) 22:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
I've started a discussion on Downing Street Chief of Staff concerning Lord Heywood. If you're interested, you can find it here. FollowTheTortoise ( talk) 11:40, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Jeremy Heywood (Template) and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 22 § Jeremy Heywood (Template) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
1234qwer
1234qwer
4 14:16, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Was he the first Life Peer, who has never taken his seat? HulkNorris ( talk) 19:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Jeremy Heywood article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A news item involving Jeremy Heywood was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 4 November 2018. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Should this be included? I'm a mere pleb, but feel it may become an interesting story later in the week: Daily Mail article below reads: The role of Britain’s top mandarin in promoting the controversial £28billion takeover of the defence giant BAE by a European rival was last night under the spotlight. Cabinet Secretary Sir Jeremy Heywood has helped persuade David Cameron to back the plans to join BAE Systems with EADS. But he faces questions about his own role – and whether it constitutes a conflict of interest because he worked for three years at merchant bank Morgan Stanley, which stands to gain tens of millions from brokering the merger.
< http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2207611/BAE-deal-Conflict-fears-David-Camerons-right-hand-mandarin-Sir-Jeremy-Heywood.html#ixzz27L2GFkz8> 212.139.111.220 ( talk) 23:26, 23 September 2012 (UTC)pleb 212.139.111.220 ( talk) 23:26, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
according to DM of 24/09/2012, he's been asked to investigate the matter < http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2207371/Cabinet-Secretary-Sir-Jeremy-Heywood-asked-investigate-minister-Andrew-Mitchell-really-did-police-officers-plebs-told-bike.html> — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.139.111.220 ( talk) 23:46, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jeremy Heywood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:36, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
I suspect most readers will assume it's Whitehall. But the article says "Baron Heywood of Whitehall, of Glossop in the County of Derbyshire". But there is no article for Whitehall, Glossop. Should it be at least added to the "Places" section at Whitehall (disambiguation)? Martinevans123 ( talk) 12:59, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Earlier today, @
Sandstein:
removed the following passage, with the edit summary this is not about Heywood, but about Brexit
:
Heywood said in a blog that the "civil service did its job" and was "scrupulous" during the referendum, producing work "as we should, at pace and with accuracy". It comes after officials were accused by Eurosceptics of promoting
"Project Fear" during the EU referendum in a bid to keep Britain in the European Union.
Iain Duncan Smith said: "There was huge pressure from Government and lines got blurred and broken. "But after purdah [which restricted civil servants] there was no question that the civil service was more comfortable being able to say no." Heywood also admitted that the civil service will have to "go up a gear or two" as it seeks to unwind decades worth of EU laws and regulations.
Later, @ 81.129.228.25: [ https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Jeremy_Heywood&diff=prev&oldid=867299515 restored the passage with the edit summary "restore sourced content, perfectly relevant, take to Talk page", which I'm doing now. My personal view is that whilst 81.129.228.25 is right that the material is sourced, Sandstein is right that it's about Brexit rather than Heywood; so I'm happy to be in a consensus against inclusion of the paragraph. Ralbegen ( talk) 22:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
I've started a discussion on Downing Street Chief of Staff concerning Lord Heywood. If you're interested, you can find it here. FollowTheTortoise ( talk) 11:40, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Jeremy Heywood (Template) and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 22 § Jeremy Heywood (Template) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
1234qwer
1234qwer
4 14:16, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Was he the first Life Peer, who has never taken his seat? HulkNorris ( talk) 19:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)