![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 10 July 2018. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should the Notability tag be removed at this point as the article has expanded and the page is about an incumbent and relevant Nebraska politician? I believe it should, but am unsure whether or not to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redditaddict69 ( talk • contribs) 04:45, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Should there be an entry on funds available and what the candidate has said about her funding?
The entry on the senate race is so neutral it gives virtually no information. Tero111 ( talk) 02:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Lincoln has the large student population and the local college paper has discussed her chances.
Tero111 ( talk) 20:45, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Raybold has stated that Deb Fischer has voted on party lines "98% of the time" (campaign speech in Lincoln)
She has stated she opposes the Republican healthcare approach. Deb Fischer voted to remove Obamacare. perhaps it is stated more clearly in her website, but she intends to do something. OK, she says this: "American citizens have a right to affordable, comprehensive health care, but our system is broken. More than 100,000 Nebraskans use the Affordable Care Act for their medical coverage, but some aspects of the law as written, are not fit for Nebraska families, farmers and senior citizens. The bottom line is this: Hard-working Nebraskans should not have to choose between putting food on the table or paying for insurance for their families. We need to mend, not end, the Affordable Care Act with a replacement solution that works for Nebraska families, farmers and seniors."
Please condense that to a few lines.
She also supports public schools fully.
Tero111 ( talk) 22:23, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Well, add it there then. I am unwilling to type up edits that usually get deleted. Just bringing up the added relevance. That article is not in danger of being removed, this one is. I am not the author of either article. Tero111 ( talk) 11:29, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
A sleeper candidate is notable till election
The Hill article discusses these issues.
I don't edit references as I get the format wrong somehow. Tero111 ( talk) 14:40, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Many votes in this article's deletion discussion are for a keep (more so, anything but a delete) and @ Champlax: seems to think that the article should be restored (he did it himself, but I undid it). So, if anyone wants to put this into WP:Deletion review, I support it going there. I will, however, abstain from voting at a DR given that I created the article and personally don't think it should be recreated. The consensus may end up being overwhelmingly to overturn this deletion.
Before anyone puts this at DR, here are a few AfDs of candidates to look at to give perspective at what determines notability per WP:POLOUTCOMES and/or WP:NPOL:
Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 14:15, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
I would vote for a review and to resurrect the page. The deletion discussion did not address the fact that Jane Raybould was also the Democratic candidate for Lt. Governor in Nebraska's 2014 election. SubirGrewal ( talk) 16:49, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 10 July 2018. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should the Notability tag be removed at this point as the article has expanded and the page is about an incumbent and relevant Nebraska politician? I believe it should, but am unsure whether or not to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redditaddict69 ( talk • contribs) 04:45, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Should there be an entry on funds available and what the candidate has said about her funding?
The entry on the senate race is so neutral it gives virtually no information. Tero111 ( talk) 02:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Lincoln has the large student population and the local college paper has discussed her chances.
Tero111 ( talk) 20:45, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Raybold has stated that Deb Fischer has voted on party lines "98% of the time" (campaign speech in Lincoln)
She has stated she opposes the Republican healthcare approach. Deb Fischer voted to remove Obamacare. perhaps it is stated more clearly in her website, but she intends to do something. OK, she says this: "American citizens have a right to affordable, comprehensive health care, but our system is broken. More than 100,000 Nebraskans use the Affordable Care Act for their medical coverage, but some aspects of the law as written, are not fit for Nebraska families, farmers and senior citizens. The bottom line is this: Hard-working Nebraskans should not have to choose between putting food on the table or paying for insurance for their families. We need to mend, not end, the Affordable Care Act with a replacement solution that works for Nebraska families, farmers and seniors."
Please condense that to a few lines.
She also supports public schools fully.
Tero111 ( talk) 22:23, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Well, add it there then. I am unwilling to type up edits that usually get deleted. Just bringing up the added relevance. That article is not in danger of being removed, this one is. I am not the author of either article. Tero111 ( talk) 11:29, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
A sleeper candidate is notable till election
The Hill article discusses these issues.
I don't edit references as I get the format wrong somehow. Tero111 ( talk) 14:40, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Many votes in this article's deletion discussion are for a keep (more so, anything but a delete) and @ Champlax: seems to think that the article should be restored (he did it himself, but I undid it). So, if anyone wants to put this into WP:Deletion review, I support it going there. I will, however, abstain from voting at a DR given that I created the article and personally don't think it should be recreated. The consensus may end up being overwhelmingly to overturn this deletion.
Before anyone puts this at DR, here are a few AfDs of candidates to look at to give perspective at what determines notability per WP:POLOUTCOMES and/or WP:NPOL:
Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 14:15, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
I would vote for a review and to resurrect the page. The deletion discussion did not address the fact that Jane Raybould was also the Democratic candidate for Lt. Governor in Nebraska's 2014 election. SubirGrewal ( talk) 16:49, 8 October 2018 (UTC)