This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Awards Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Literature Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Netherlands This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (not just an organized event) -- Shockworld ( talk) 07:06, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Currently this is just an unreferenced list of its previous winners; what's the criteria for winning, why is this award important, what makes it important? Grammarxxx ^{( What'd I do this time?)} 07:09, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply

[1]- Shockworld ( talk) 07:13, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Wow, a google link, you've totally gotten your point across without even having to improve the actual article. Grammarxxx ^{( What'd I do this time?)} 07:17, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply