Jamie Dornan was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 17, 2023). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 3 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
Jamie Dornan is about 1,70 m tall. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nerissa-Marie ( talk • contribs) 02:48, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
I am wondering where the information that Jamie Dornan's birthdate is 4 June 1982 came from. According to the IMDb website, it is 1 May 1982. PerriAlexis ( talk) 02:51, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Born James Dornan May 1, 1982 (age 32) Holywood (Co. Down), Northern Ireland, UK -- 129.69.140.138 ( talk) 12:38, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
'The' Teeside University? Nobody would refer to it like that. It seems some editors of this page are 50 Shades of Earl Grey numpties. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.119.166 ( talk) 16:31, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
I know what the editor meant but I don't think titular is accurate, in that it is used incorrectly here as a synonym for eponymous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by QuintBy ( talk • contribs) 18:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Please note that per WP:LEADIMAGE the lead image should be an image that is a natural visual representation of the person. A face that has the eyebrows distorted is not the most natural representation of the person. Until a better one comes along, I would suggest not to use that image as the lead image. Hzh ( talk) 13:40, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
So that we don't have endless revert, it would be appreciated if people can decide by consensus which of the Jamie Dornan's they would prefer -
I'd vote for image 1 because it is full faced, does not have any facial distortion, it therefore most resembles the person and satisfies the requirement for "images that are natural and appropriate visual representations of the topic" best per WP:LEADIMAGE. Hzh ( talk) 11:07, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Image 3, after being notified of the ongoing situation of this problem, I decided to add input. I agree that image 3 represents Dornan better. Image 2 contains an expression that isn't very flattering. In fact, it looks like he is about to sneeze. Image 1 is very outdated. We're in 2015, not 2011. He has changed since then. Callmemirela ( Talk) 20:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
After a week without any further contributions, this is how it stands -
Strongjam considered Image 2 the best picture but also thought that Image 1 is the most appropriate for the infobox, hence I'm putting his/her vote there. Tenebrae also expressed reservation about the quality of Image 1 but would choose it. There appears to be a majority in favor of Image 1, so I will change the image on the infobox. I'm leaving this open for a longer period if other people want to express their opinion or change their vote. I will have a look in a month or two times. Hzh ( talk)
This discussion has been quiet for a long time and though it seems that image one, linked in Hzh's summary about, was preferred for a while after this discussion the article has stayed at a fourth image, one that is a portrait from 2013. It is more recent that image 1, and it avoids the problems brought up in the discussion pointed out above, with the exception that it isn't the most recent image of it. @ Genisp: and 186.155.57.38 ( talk · contribs) recently removed the image for image three, linked above and currently on the page. I reverted once, the IP edit, admittedly without much explanation. I'm pinging Genisp to point to the discussion and also to reopen this discussion, I guess? ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 21:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
There seems to be a conflict over what Jamie's nationality should be, personally I would've thought Northern Irish was more appropriate especially considering he's from the Protestant side of the tracks. You'd probably need a source to show that he's taken Irish nationality.-- Comnenus ( talk) 16:35, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
You can't classify someone from a country if they have no connections and no passport simply by identifying. Northern Irish is a country therefore it is obviously a nationality and not otherwise, either that or British. He simply cannot be classified as Irish it is illogical and makes no sense. Stuv3 ( talk) 10:15, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Note all. Do not insert a nationality or assumption of nationality into the article unless you can locate a source that states, specifically states, he has Irish citizenship. People born in NI are British citizens by birth unless a choice has been made to rescind British citizenship and take Irish citizenship. Yes all people in NI are entitled to Irish citizenship, but despite some incorrect interpretation by some editors, it is not automatically conferred at birth. You need to apply for it. WP:Synthesis applies here as this is a controversial topic. As per the Synthesis policy "Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources." This means unless a reliable source can be located that specifically states they have X citizenship, we cannot add that. "I feel Irish" does not equal evidence of citizenship or nationality. Also be aware that all rules regarding WP:BLP apply here. Since this is a controversial area, and has been subject to much edit warring, I am pinging a few users who are experienced in this area just to keep this on their radar. Mabuska, BrownHairedGirl, GoodDay, Doug Weller. Note these editors are all from both sides of the NI political divide, or separated from it completely, so have differing opinions on the state of Northern Ireland in relation to Ireland, and edit neutrally on these topics. Canterbury Tail talk 03:22, 4 March 2018 (UTC) Bastun, mistyped previously. Canterbury Tail talk 03:23, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
I'll always side with using British, when it concerns the nationality of people from the United Kingdom. The UK is the sovereign state here. Needless to say, I despise that we use Scottish, English, Northern Irish & Welsh on most of these UK bios. GoodDay ( talk) 11:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
The Good Friday Agreement states that any individual born in Northern Ireland has the birth right to identify as, be respected as well as hold citizenship as an Irish citizen. As someone mentioned, they are NOT automatically solely British citizens and they do not have to 'rescind' this to hold Irish citizenship. I believe under the Good Friday Agreement, as it states that their choice of nationality should be respected, it should state that Jamie is Irish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Serious Guy ( talk • contribs) 17:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
He was born in Northern Ireland, United Mega Kingdom. Northern Ireland is part of the UK. so He is British since the day he was born in to this earth. He has a British passport because He is a British citizen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.207.195.12 ( talk) 08:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
So rather than removing material, let's consider. He has stated that he identifies as Irish. That's now well referenced. We can certainly include the fact that he identifies as Irish, and not state his citizenship, and thereby follow WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NOR. I think the removal is not justified, but hopefully my slight re-wording is sufficient? Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 18:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
INeedSupport reverted my removal of the title "Professor" in the description of Dornan's father. This is a direct contradiction to MOS:CREDENTIAL: "Academic and professional titles (such as "Dr." or "Professor") should be used in a Wikipedia article only when the subject is widely known by a pseudonym or stage name containing such a title ". I would like for INeedSupport to explain why his/her opinion is more important than an official manual of style for biographies, or revert his/her edit. 75.182.115.183 ( talk) 16:02, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Thoughts? Pending is stopping a lot of disruptive editing constantly, however it seems that every single edit by a non-registered user is disruptive here and it's just taking people's time to constantly work with. Anyone object if we switch it to full protection for non-confirmed? Canterbury Tail talk 22:35, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
I came to discuss about the crisis we are having right now with Canterbury tails. Fitzwilliams ( talk) 12:03, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
But, there are several pages of celebrities who behold such sectios. I have mentioned it earlier. Then howcome can those exist not mine? Mine was as a representation of the general perception of him as was those on other pages. I also cited notable magazines and newspapers as those sections on other pages showed earlier. How did my edits become inappropriate and not those? Please underline the difference.
Fitzwilliams ( talk) 12:47, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Or do I need to change my choice of notability when I am writing about someone? What is exceptional and neutral, should be selected- is that what I should bear in mind? Fitzwilliams ( talk) 13:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply. Fitzwilliams ( talk) 15:01, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Canterbury tail has twice reverted one of my edits and now I am here for other editors' opinions. Donating a tie to charity auctions seems gossip information to Canterbury tail. May I request you all editors who ever see this, go to Kate Winslet's wiki page and see the philanthropy. The second line says," she donated a blue top of her that she wore in ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF A SPOTLESS MIND to a charity auction." Is this gossip? If it is why hasn't anybody reverted it yet? My question is for Canterbury tail, what was the difference between mine and this? Why do you mind this a gossip editing? If these are gossip then you should also revert the one in Winslet's page. Even I mentioned something in your talk page. So , all editors are requested to point out their statements here.
You have to consider the tie wasn't an ordinary tie given to him for his past role. The success of the movie made the ordinary tie precious to his fans and he considered it for donation to create fund for the charity. In this way if you think, it's kindness. It wasn't a selfish money heisting auction that he took participate in. In any tipes of charitable work a celebrity participates in, should be notable I think. And I may say,other stuff exist point give a valid and arguable notion here. ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF A SPOTLESS MIND, was a breakthrough, blockbuster art for the other celebrity for which only a small blue top was worthy of auction. By the way,Wikipedia has enough space to hold a 14-20 words sentence. Fitzwilliams ( talk) 11:55, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you Sciencefish for solving the problems. Now there should be no argument regarding this, I think. Fitzwilliams ( talk) 12:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
I have opened this topic to discuss about a song 'When I go' on Discography. There were no notable citation found anywhere for that song. So I wanted to know if it should be reverted or not. Editors are welcomed to help sort out the problem. Fitzwilliams ( talk) 13:30, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change citation 5 to citation needed - the website hosting the citation is no longer hosting the article - Also greer garson would be 117 years old at this point were she still to be alive, it needs to be investigated that someone at 39 year olds could physically be two generations younger than someone at 117 years old. 79.70.228.241 ( talk) 22:49, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
{{
cn}}
. As to the generational thing - the source specifically says that Garson was his grandmother's first cousin, and while I haven't looked into any specifics the 78-year age difference is entirely plausible. (My oldest grandparent was 69 years older than me and he had some cousins significantly older than he was, so I likely had similar relatives with a greater difference in ages.) ‑‑
ElHef (
Meep?) 23:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC)This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
citation 7 states that greer garson is Jamie's Great-Aunt, not First cousin Twice Removed as stated in citation 5 - this needs correction to make the article state "Jamie is the great-nephew to Greer Garson" rather than falsely stating that Jamie is her first cousin twice removed, which is physically impossible, based on what a first cousin twice removed actually means. (the child, of the child of the cousin) being that Jamie is 39, and Greer would be 117 79.70.228.241 ( talk) 23:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
citation 5 EXPLICITY states he is greer garsons great nephew. the wikipedia article states he is a first cousin twice removed, this is infact wrong, as previously stated - article 5, and 7 both quote jamie personally as stating 'my great aunt was a woman called Greer Garson.' the line in the wikipedia article 'he is a first cousin twice removed' is specifically wrong, and is in improper terminology, he is infact the great nephew this line should either read 'he is the great-nephew to greer garson' or 'his great aunt, is greer garson'
Please see this wikipedia article's graphical breakdown of what a cousin tree shows to be a first cousin twice removed, https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/87/CousinTree.svg/1200px-CousinTree.svg.png, and what infact a great aunt is https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/Aunts.png
this article implies jamie doesnt know his own family history and is meaning that greer garson is the daughter of his great aunt, which contradicts what he states himself. 79.70.228.241 ( talk) 14:32, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Just reverted four possible vandalism cases. I Request the authority to impose semi-protection. Fitzwilliams ( talk) 16:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
To self-righteous, far-Right nationalists such as you adding factual information may be seen as vandalism. However, it's entirely valid to state he was born in the United Kingdom. Piers39293 ( talk) 01:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
@ Fitzwilliams: Hi there. I don't understand why you created a separate page List of Jamie Dornan performances in Sept 2021. Why not just put the relevant tables into this article under "Filmography". I was about to do that and then stumbled across the existing stuff that you had already done separately. I'd like to propose merging List of Jamie Dornan performances into Jamie Dornan. There is lots of repeated information in the lead and nothing new other than the filmography tables. If you agree, I'll just go ahead and do it, otherwise I'll kick off a proper merge proposal per WP:MERGEPROP. If you're worried the filmography will make this article too long and clunky, the tables can be auto-hidden, but I don't personally see a problem. Rodney Baggins ( talk) 10:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
@ Rodney Baggins: Thanks for that. Before creating the article I visited similar articles where photos were placed. So I added that. And I will suggest not to remove the lead section there, to considerable extent. Because if you follow other similar articles you will find repeat of information too. According to me, we cannot help with the repeat of information there, as notable projects and nominations or awards are also written on the lead article. I think one can just change the style a bit. Fitzwilliams ( talk) 15:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Mike Christie ( talk · contribs) 13:13, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
I'll review this. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 13:13, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Images are appropriately licensed. Earwig shows an overlap with this site but after looking at a couple of other articles it appears they took the text from Wikipedia, not vice versa. Similarly this site appears to have copied from the article.
I'll continue the review once these are addressed. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 15:40, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Spotchecks. Footnote numbers refer to this version:
I'm going to stop there and fail this nomination. The spotcheck for a GA has to come up clean; if just one or two of these had had problems I would ask you to fix them and then done more, but finding six issues from seven checks means that it's best to fail it, and give you time to go through and check all the sources to make sure they accurately cover the text they cite. Each citation has to support all the information it is used for, and avoid close paraphrasing. I didn't see any close paraphrasing issues here.
I also notice some prose issues while reading through the article. I'll list a few examples here of things I think need to be fixed. You could try asking the GOCE for a copyedit, or see if anyone else interested in the article is willing to help out.
The article seems to have the appropriate structure; I think once you've done the source-text integrity checks, and the article's been copyedited, it would be very much worth nominating again. Best of luck with it. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 13:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
The Irish Times doesn't "acknowledge" anything about actors being in either from Northern Ireland or Ireland in its article. It's a distinction that plays no part in list. So Dornan's birth place isn't "acknowledged" any more than it "acknowledges" Brosnan is from Drogheda or Branagh is from Belfast. Describing Dornan's listing as such is placing undue emphasis on a facet that is not evident in the source. Escape Orbit (Talk) 15:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Jamie Dornan was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 17, 2023). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 3 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
Jamie Dornan is about 1,70 m tall. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nerissa-Marie ( talk • contribs) 02:48, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
I am wondering where the information that Jamie Dornan's birthdate is 4 June 1982 came from. According to the IMDb website, it is 1 May 1982. PerriAlexis ( talk) 02:51, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Born James Dornan May 1, 1982 (age 32) Holywood (Co. Down), Northern Ireland, UK -- 129.69.140.138 ( talk) 12:38, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
'The' Teeside University? Nobody would refer to it like that. It seems some editors of this page are 50 Shades of Earl Grey numpties. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.119.166 ( talk) 16:31, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
I know what the editor meant but I don't think titular is accurate, in that it is used incorrectly here as a synonym for eponymous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by QuintBy ( talk • contribs) 18:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Please note that per WP:LEADIMAGE the lead image should be an image that is a natural visual representation of the person. A face that has the eyebrows distorted is not the most natural representation of the person. Until a better one comes along, I would suggest not to use that image as the lead image. Hzh ( talk) 13:40, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
So that we don't have endless revert, it would be appreciated if people can decide by consensus which of the Jamie Dornan's they would prefer -
I'd vote for image 1 because it is full faced, does not have any facial distortion, it therefore most resembles the person and satisfies the requirement for "images that are natural and appropriate visual representations of the topic" best per WP:LEADIMAGE. Hzh ( talk) 11:07, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Image 3, after being notified of the ongoing situation of this problem, I decided to add input. I agree that image 3 represents Dornan better. Image 2 contains an expression that isn't very flattering. In fact, it looks like he is about to sneeze. Image 1 is very outdated. We're in 2015, not 2011. He has changed since then. Callmemirela ( Talk) 20:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
After a week without any further contributions, this is how it stands -
Strongjam considered Image 2 the best picture but also thought that Image 1 is the most appropriate for the infobox, hence I'm putting his/her vote there. Tenebrae also expressed reservation about the quality of Image 1 but would choose it. There appears to be a majority in favor of Image 1, so I will change the image on the infobox. I'm leaving this open for a longer period if other people want to express their opinion or change their vote. I will have a look in a month or two times. Hzh ( talk)
This discussion has been quiet for a long time and though it seems that image one, linked in Hzh's summary about, was preferred for a while after this discussion the article has stayed at a fourth image, one that is a portrait from 2013. It is more recent that image 1, and it avoids the problems brought up in the discussion pointed out above, with the exception that it isn't the most recent image of it. @ Genisp: and 186.155.57.38 ( talk · contribs) recently removed the image for image three, linked above and currently on the page. I reverted once, the IP edit, admittedly without much explanation. I'm pinging Genisp to point to the discussion and also to reopen this discussion, I guess? ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 21:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
There seems to be a conflict over what Jamie's nationality should be, personally I would've thought Northern Irish was more appropriate especially considering he's from the Protestant side of the tracks. You'd probably need a source to show that he's taken Irish nationality.-- Comnenus ( talk) 16:35, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
You can't classify someone from a country if they have no connections and no passport simply by identifying. Northern Irish is a country therefore it is obviously a nationality and not otherwise, either that or British. He simply cannot be classified as Irish it is illogical and makes no sense. Stuv3 ( talk) 10:15, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Note all. Do not insert a nationality or assumption of nationality into the article unless you can locate a source that states, specifically states, he has Irish citizenship. People born in NI are British citizens by birth unless a choice has been made to rescind British citizenship and take Irish citizenship. Yes all people in NI are entitled to Irish citizenship, but despite some incorrect interpretation by some editors, it is not automatically conferred at birth. You need to apply for it. WP:Synthesis applies here as this is a controversial topic. As per the Synthesis policy "Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources." This means unless a reliable source can be located that specifically states they have X citizenship, we cannot add that. "I feel Irish" does not equal evidence of citizenship or nationality. Also be aware that all rules regarding WP:BLP apply here. Since this is a controversial area, and has been subject to much edit warring, I am pinging a few users who are experienced in this area just to keep this on their radar. Mabuska, BrownHairedGirl, GoodDay, Doug Weller. Note these editors are all from both sides of the NI political divide, or separated from it completely, so have differing opinions on the state of Northern Ireland in relation to Ireland, and edit neutrally on these topics. Canterbury Tail talk 03:22, 4 March 2018 (UTC) Bastun, mistyped previously. Canterbury Tail talk 03:23, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
I'll always side with using British, when it concerns the nationality of people from the United Kingdom. The UK is the sovereign state here. Needless to say, I despise that we use Scottish, English, Northern Irish & Welsh on most of these UK bios. GoodDay ( talk) 11:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
The Good Friday Agreement states that any individual born in Northern Ireland has the birth right to identify as, be respected as well as hold citizenship as an Irish citizen. As someone mentioned, they are NOT automatically solely British citizens and they do not have to 'rescind' this to hold Irish citizenship. I believe under the Good Friday Agreement, as it states that their choice of nationality should be respected, it should state that Jamie is Irish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Serious Guy ( talk • contribs) 17:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
He was born in Northern Ireland, United Mega Kingdom. Northern Ireland is part of the UK. so He is British since the day he was born in to this earth. He has a British passport because He is a British citizen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.207.195.12 ( talk) 08:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
So rather than removing material, let's consider. He has stated that he identifies as Irish. That's now well referenced. We can certainly include the fact that he identifies as Irish, and not state his citizenship, and thereby follow WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NOR. I think the removal is not justified, but hopefully my slight re-wording is sufficient? Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 18:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
INeedSupport reverted my removal of the title "Professor" in the description of Dornan's father. This is a direct contradiction to MOS:CREDENTIAL: "Academic and professional titles (such as "Dr." or "Professor") should be used in a Wikipedia article only when the subject is widely known by a pseudonym or stage name containing such a title ". I would like for INeedSupport to explain why his/her opinion is more important than an official manual of style for biographies, or revert his/her edit. 75.182.115.183 ( talk) 16:02, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Thoughts? Pending is stopping a lot of disruptive editing constantly, however it seems that every single edit by a non-registered user is disruptive here and it's just taking people's time to constantly work with. Anyone object if we switch it to full protection for non-confirmed? Canterbury Tail talk 22:35, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
I came to discuss about the crisis we are having right now with Canterbury tails. Fitzwilliams ( talk) 12:03, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
But, there are several pages of celebrities who behold such sectios. I have mentioned it earlier. Then howcome can those exist not mine? Mine was as a representation of the general perception of him as was those on other pages. I also cited notable magazines and newspapers as those sections on other pages showed earlier. How did my edits become inappropriate and not those? Please underline the difference.
Fitzwilliams ( talk) 12:47, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Or do I need to change my choice of notability when I am writing about someone? What is exceptional and neutral, should be selected- is that what I should bear in mind? Fitzwilliams ( talk) 13:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply. Fitzwilliams ( talk) 15:01, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Canterbury tail has twice reverted one of my edits and now I am here for other editors' opinions. Donating a tie to charity auctions seems gossip information to Canterbury tail. May I request you all editors who ever see this, go to Kate Winslet's wiki page and see the philanthropy. The second line says," she donated a blue top of her that she wore in ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF A SPOTLESS MIND to a charity auction." Is this gossip? If it is why hasn't anybody reverted it yet? My question is for Canterbury tail, what was the difference between mine and this? Why do you mind this a gossip editing? If these are gossip then you should also revert the one in Winslet's page. Even I mentioned something in your talk page. So , all editors are requested to point out their statements here.
You have to consider the tie wasn't an ordinary tie given to him for his past role. The success of the movie made the ordinary tie precious to his fans and he considered it for donation to create fund for the charity. In this way if you think, it's kindness. It wasn't a selfish money heisting auction that he took participate in. In any tipes of charitable work a celebrity participates in, should be notable I think. And I may say,other stuff exist point give a valid and arguable notion here. ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF A SPOTLESS MIND, was a breakthrough, blockbuster art for the other celebrity for which only a small blue top was worthy of auction. By the way,Wikipedia has enough space to hold a 14-20 words sentence. Fitzwilliams ( talk) 11:55, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you Sciencefish for solving the problems. Now there should be no argument regarding this, I think. Fitzwilliams ( talk) 12:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
I have opened this topic to discuss about a song 'When I go' on Discography. There were no notable citation found anywhere for that song. So I wanted to know if it should be reverted or not. Editors are welcomed to help sort out the problem. Fitzwilliams ( talk) 13:30, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change citation 5 to citation needed - the website hosting the citation is no longer hosting the article - Also greer garson would be 117 years old at this point were she still to be alive, it needs to be investigated that someone at 39 year olds could physically be two generations younger than someone at 117 years old. 79.70.228.241 ( talk) 22:49, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
{{
cn}}
. As to the generational thing - the source specifically says that Garson was his grandmother's first cousin, and while I haven't looked into any specifics the 78-year age difference is entirely plausible. (My oldest grandparent was 69 years older than me and he had some cousins significantly older than he was, so I likely had similar relatives with a greater difference in ages.) ‑‑
ElHef (
Meep?) 23:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC)This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
citation 7 states that greer garson is Jamie's Great-Aunt, not First cousin Twice Removed as stated in citation 5 - this needs correction to make the article state "Jamie is the great-nephew to Greer Garson" rather than falsely stating that Jamie is her first cousin twice removed, which is physically impossible, based on what a first cousin twice removed actually means. (the child, of the child of the cousin) being that Jamie is 39, and Greer would be 117 79.70.228.241 ( talk) 23:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
citation 5 EXPLICITY states he is greer garsons great nephew. the wikipedia article states he is a first cousin twice removed, this is infact wrong, as previously stated - article 5, and 7 both quote jamie personally as stating 'my great aunt was a woman called Greer Garson.' the line in the wikipedia article 'he is a first cousin twice removed' is specifically wrong, and is in improper terminology, he is infact the great nephew this line should either read 'he is the great-nephew to greer garson' or 'his great aunt, is greer garson'
Please see this wikipedia article's graphical breakdown of what a cousin tree shows to be a first cousin twice removed, https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/87/CousinTree.svg/1200px-CousinTree.svg.png, and what infact a great aunt is https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/Aunts.png
this article implies jamie doesnt know his own family history and is meaning that greer garson is the daughter of his great aunt, which contradicts what he states himself. 79.70.228.241 ( talk) 14:32, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Just reverted four possible vandalism cases. I Request the authority to impose semi-protection. Fitzwilliams ( talk) 16:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
To self-righteous, far-Right nationalists such as you adding factual information may be seen as vandalism. However, it's entirely valid to state he was born in the United Kingdom. Piers39293 ( talk) 01:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
@ Fitzwilliams: Hi there. I don't understand why you created a separate page List of Jamie Dornan performances in Sept 2021. Why not just put the relevant tables into this article under "Filmography". I was about to do that and then stumbled across the existing stuff that you had already done separately. I'd like to propose merging List of Jamie Dornan performances into Jamie Dornan. There is lots of repeated information in the lead and nothing new other than the filmography tables. If you agree, I'll just go ahead and do it, otherwise I'll kick off a proper merge proposal per WP:MERGEPROP. If you're worried the filmography will make this article too long and clunky, the tables can be auto-hidden, but I don't personally see a problem. Rodney Baggins ( talk) 10:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
@ Rodney Baggins: Thanks for that. Before creating the article I visited similar articles where photos were placed. So I added that. And I will suggest not to remove the lead section there, to considerable extent. Because if you follow other similar articles you will find repeat of information too. According to me, we cannot help with the repeat of information there, as notable projects and nominations or awards are also written on the lead article. I think one can just change the style a bit. Fitzwilliams ( talk) 15:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Mike Christie ( talk · contribs) 13:13, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
I'll review this. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 13:13, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Images are appropriately licensed. Earwig shows an overlap with this site but after looking at a couple of other articles it appears they took the text from Wikipedia, not vice versa. Similarly this site appears to have copied from the article.
I'll continue the review once these are addressed. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 15:40, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Spotchecks. Footnote numbers refer to this version:
I'm going to stop there and fail this nomination. The spotcheck for a GA has to come up clean; if just one or two of these had had problems I would ask you to fix them and then done more, but finding six issues from seven checks means that it's best to fail it, and give you time to go through and check all the sources to make sure they accurately cover the text they cite. Each citation has to support all the information it is used for, and avoid close paraphrasing. I didn't see any close paraphrasing issues here.
I also notice some prose issues while reading through the article. I'll list a few examples here of things I think need to be fixed. You could try asking the GOCE for a copyedit, or see if anyone else interested in the article is willing to help out.
The article seems to have the appropriate structure; I think once you've done the source-text integrity checks, and the article's been copyedited, it would be very much worth nominating again. Best of luck with it. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 13:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
The Irish Times doesn't "acknowledge" anything about actors being in either from Northern Ireland or Ireland in its article. It's a distinction that plays no part in list. So Dornan's birth place isn't "acknowledged" any more than it "acknowledges" Brosnan is from Drogheda or Branagh is from Belfast. Describing Dornan's listing as such is placing undue emphasis on a facet that is not evident in the source. Escape Orbit (Talk) 15:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)