![]() | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
First, I'm not really sure that this page is necessary. All the information is either handled (and handled better) in a variety of other more specific pages. Second, the page almost amounts to the definition of a term rather than a description of anything specific.
If this page is to stay, the description needs to be greatly improved. At a minimum the South Lebannon Army/"Free Lebanon"'s role in the security zone needs to be worked in. The reason Israeli losses were as low as they were is because the SLA was doing most of the dying for them. 64.12.117.8 03:15, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
The article appears to reflect the personal opinion of the author/editor.
I'm not sure what is "unencyclopedic" about my addition to the intro. You acknowledge that the PLO fought from Lebanon against Israel. This would explain Israel's motive to "respond" with a security zone.
The chicken and egg issue concerns PR from the two sides. Hizbollah said it was "responding" to Israel, and Israel said it was "responding" to Hizbollah and company. The dispute over who is the aggressor and who is "fighting back" is what I meant by chicken and egg; I ought to have been more clear, I guess.
To be neutral, we must state both sides: not just the pro-Israel side (I am pro Israeli). We must also state the Hizbollah or other anti-Israeli side.
I tried to do this in the intro. -- Uncle Ed 15:58, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
I've come across the above article, which appears to cover a similar or identical topic to this one. I'm not sure which is the better title, but as this article is the older and more developed, I've proposed that article be merged here. Either way, they should probably be merged into one article. Robofish ( talk) 23:29, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
I restored this talk page and labeled it as a redirect for all the projects involved. Please take all discussion to South Lebanon security belt. Thanks. — Torchiest talk edits 12:36, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
First, I'm not really sure that this page is necessary. All the information is either handled (and handled better) in a variety of other more specific pages. Second, the page almost amounts to the definition of a term rather than a description of anything specific.
If this page is to stay, the description needs to be greatly improved. At a minimum the South Lebannon Army/"Free Lebanon"'s role in the security zone needs to be worked in. The reason Israeli losses were as low as they were is because the SLA was doing most of the dying for them. 64.12.117.8 03:15, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
The article appears to reflect the personal opinion of the author/editor.
I'm not sure what is "unencyclopedic" about my addition to the intro. You acknowledge that the PLO fought from Lebanon against Israel. This would explain Israel's motive to "respond" with a security zone.
The chicken and egg issue concerns PR from the two sides. Hizbollah said it was "responding" to Israel, and Israel said it was "responding" to Hizbollah and company. The dispute over who is the aggressor and who is "fighting back" is what I meant by chicken and egg; I ought to have been more clear, I guess.
To be neutral, we must state both sides: not just the pro-Israel side (I am pro Israeli). We must also state the Hizbollah or other anti-Israeli side.
I tried to do this in the intro. -- Uncle Ed 15:58, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
I've come across the above article, which appears to cover a similar or identical topic to this one. I'm not sure which is the better title, but as this article is the older and more developed, I've proposed that article be merged here. Either way, they should probably be merged into one article. Robofish ( talk) 23:29, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
I restored this talk page and labeled it as a redirect for all the projects involved. Please take all discussion to South Lebanon security belt. Thanks. — Torchiest talk edits 12:36, 17 June 2013 (UTC)