![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
There are actually two types of isomorphisms - competitive and institutional. DiMaggio and Powell only wrote about institutional isomorphism. Hannan and Freeman (1977), Meyer (1979) and Fennel (1980) discussed competitive isomorphisms in more details.
Wan Saiful Wan Jan London
I think there should be a related link to Convergent evolution — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.180.44 ( talk) 04:26, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 00:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
The article says there are three types of institutional isomorphism, but doesn't define these terms. This should be a simple fix.
In addition, Mizruchi and Fein (1999) say these are not distinct types of isomorphism, but rather ways for isomorphism to merge. Robertekraut ( talk) 19:52, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
There are actually two types of isomorphisms - competitive and institutional. DiMaggio and Powell only wrote about institutional isomorphism. Hannan and Freeman (1977), Meyer (1979) and Fennel (1980) discussed competitive isomorphisms in more details.
Wan Saiful Wan Jan London
I think there should be a related link to Convergent evolution — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.180.44 ( talk) 04:26, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 00:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
The article says there are three types of institutional isomorphism, but doesn't define these terms. This should be a simple fix.
In addition, Mizruchi and Fein (1999) say these are not distinct types of isomorphism, but rather ways for isomorphism to merge. Robertekraut ( talk) 19:52, 2 October 2015 (UTC)