![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Isla Dewar appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 17 November 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk)
01:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Created by Emcee47 ( talk) and Victuallers ( talk). Nominated by Victuallers ( talk) at 13:18, 30 October 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: - Has not been completed.
Overall:
A few problems with formatting and sourcing. Earwig gives a possible violation but the bulk of it is her list of works so I have no problems there. The hook is alright as is (noting formatting suggestions above), but I think there are more interesting hooks to be found within the article (living in the mansion, writing the screenplay for
Women Talking Dirty, a book per year, 17 languages, etc.), though that's something to be left up to you.
PCN02WPS (
talk |
contribs)
14:48, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Complete lists of works, appropriately sourced to reliable scholarship ( WP:V), are encouraged, particularly when such lists are not already freely available on the internet, though I can't tell whether "are encouraged" refers to the addition of the lists or the sourcing of the lists. Really, my only experience with this is with WP:ITNRD, where nominations are (semi-)regularly rejected for having incomplete or non-existent sourcing for bibliographies/filmographies, etc., but admittedly I don't know if the same principle applies at DYK. If not, you can go ahead and add the list back and I will AGF with that part of it. As for the rest of the nomination, the QPQ looks good, sourcing is good, and if you're happy with the hook that's all good with me. PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 19:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Isla Dewar appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 17 November 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk)
01:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Created by Emcee47 ( talk) and Victuallers ( talk). Nominated by Victuallers ( talk) at 13:18, 30 October 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: - Has not been completed.
Overall:
A few problems with formatting and sourcing. Earwig gives a possible violation but the bulk of it is her list of works so I have no problems there. The hook is alright as is (noting formatting suggestions above), but I think there are more interesting hooks to be found within the article (living in the mansion, writing the screenplay for
Women Talking Dirty, a book per year, 17 languages, etc.), though that's something to be left up to you.
PCN02WPS (
talk |
contribs)
14:48, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Complete lists of works, appropriately sourced to reliable scholarship ( WP:V), are encouraged, particularly when such lists are not already freely available on the internet, though I can't tell whether "are encouraged" refers to the addition of the lists or the sourcing of the lists. Really, my only experience with this is with WP:ITNRD, where nominations are (semi-)regularly rejected for having incomplete or non-existent sourcing for bibliographies/filmographies, etc., but admittedly I don't know if the same principle applies at DYK. If not, you can go ahead and add the list back and I will AGF with that part of it. As for the rest of the nomination, the QPQ looks good, sourcing is good, and if you're happy with the hook that's all good with me. PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 19:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)