![]() | WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Iranian intervention in the Syrian civil war, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been
mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Casualties as per 2018: -549 Iranians -878 Afghans -116 Iraqis -112 Pakistanis
https://twitter.com/Alfoneh/status/984077389318717441
RedSparrow1 ( talk) 21:41, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
You need to read the orginal article BBC on which those secondary sources have based their reporting carefully. They refer to defenders of the shrine, i.e. non-Iranian Shia militias.
Julius IX ( talk) 01:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Russia's role in the Syrian Civil War which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 14:30, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Iranian involvement in the Syrian Civil War's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "businessinsider.com":
Reference named "plot":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Iranian involvement in the Syrian Civil War's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "CNN":
{{
cite news}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
It is better to add a section in the article as reasons of Iran in the Syrian Civil War. In this section, we must explain this reasons clearly. Saff V. ( talk) 08:46, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Iran is clearly taking part in the war, but i would like to ask whether its main role is supporting the Baath Government or it is in fact actively involved? I have the impression that sending logistic, financial and advisory aid warrants for support. Involvement of a limited number of volunteers and intelligence also doesn't imply active Iranian involvement. Thoughts? Sources? GreyShark ( dibra) 17:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Iranian involvement in the Syrian Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:40, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Wikaviani I have removed two sources which are from this institute that has been reporting "false news" and known for being "Anti-Muslim" per its article in Wikipedia if you have any objection discuss it here. Thanks-- SharabSalam ( talk) 02:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Iranian intervention in the Syrian civil war, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been
mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Casualties as per 2018: -549 Iranians -878 Afghans -116 Iraqis -112 Pakistanis
https://twitter.com/Alfoneh/status/984077389318717441
RedSparrow1 ( talk) 21:41, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
You need to read the orginal article BBC on which those secondary sources have based their reporting carefully. They refer to defenders of the shrine, i.e. non-Iranian Shia militias.
Julius IX ( talk) 01:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Russia's role in the Syrian Civil War which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 14:30, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Iranian involvement in the Syrian Civil War's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "businessinsider.com":
Reference named "plot":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Iranian involvement in the Syrian Civil War's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "CNN":
{{
cite news}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
It is better to add a section in the article as reasons of Iran in the Syrian Civil War. In this section, we must explain this reasons clearly. Saff V. ( talk) 08:46, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Iran is clearly taking part in the war, but i would like to ask whether its main role is supporting the Baath Government or it is in fact actively involved? I have the impression that sending logistic, financial and advisory aid warrants for support. Involvement of a limited number of volunteers and intelligence also doesn't imply active Iranian involvement. Thoughts? Sources? GreyShark ( dibra) 17:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Iranian involvement in the Syrian Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:40, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Wikaviani I have removed two sources which are from this institute that has been reporting "false news" and known for being "Anti-Muslim" per its article in Wikipedia if you have any objection discuss it here. Thanks-- SharabSalam ( talk) 02:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)