This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Intranet article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
There are distinct mean from the network view and website view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ? ( talk • contribs) ?
The dates entered here seems to be old by IT standards. If you are knowledgeable on this topic, please check it for outdated information.
In view of the seriousness of recent site hacks (Russians, Anonymous), please explain if this kind of system is secure from external attacks. If so, how? If not, why not? Thank you for your time, Wordreader ( talk) 22:43, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
There was old merge tag for a proposed merge of Enterprise private network into this article. The discussion wasn't created, so I'm doing it here. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 15:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
I believe that there should either be a merge, and have Enterprise private network re-direct here with a message saying why this should happen, or additional information on Enterprise private network for a clear distinction between the two 64.16.149.178 ( talk) 14:05, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm doing this merge now. Power~enwiki ( talk) 03:35, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
I would like to propose a small edit to the "Intranet Software" section of this article. In particular, I would propose that the following section:
"In 2018, there is a range of intranet software in use. They can be placed into a few different categories such as enterprise social networks like Workplace by Facebook, traditional intranet like Microsoft Sharepoint."
Be rewritten as:
"As of 2019, a wide variety of intranet software is in use. They can be placed into a few different categories, including enterprise social networks like Workplace by Facebook and traditional intranets like Microsoft SharePoint or Liferay."
You can view more details about Liferay's intranet offering here: https://www.liferay.com/solutions/intranets. User:Spintendo, User:ToBeFree or C.Fred is this something one of you can help with?
Please note that I am a Liferay employee.
Yotaml2 ( talk) 01:31, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi
Yotaml2, your analysis about the reliability of the sources is correct; I must have been blind.
About WP:NRSNVNA, the treatment of unsourced information in Wikipedia outside of biographies is usually not as strict as described in that essay. The essay also seems to focus on articles and notability, not the relevancy of specific sections within a non-biographical established article. A guideline that partly counters the essay can be found at WP:NNC; the verifiability policy also explicitly mentions the "citation needed" tag at WP:UNSOURCED and WP:FAILEDVERIFICATION. When in doubt, these statements are usually considered to have higher acceptance in the broader community than an essay.
I have done a bit of research regarding the three sources you've mentioned. Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spam/LinkReports/happeo.com and Special:Contributions/Roowright may be interesting. Three users, Iloveintranet ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Jacker333 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Roowright ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), have apparently only registered to add promotional links to this article. Thank you very much for discovering that problem.
I would normally, keeping WP:POINT in mind, strongly advise against deleting the section "Intranet software" as a part or result of this discussion. Instead, I would normally remove only the citations from the article (current revision is 872486997) and replace them by maintenance tags like {{ disputed inline}} and {{ citation needed}}. However, because the spam problem is so egregious, I will completely undo the following two edits:
Maybe other editors will agree to lower requirements. I personally would be uncomfortable with re-introducing similar statements unless we have an openly accessible 2019 source that provides reliable, objective data about the current market allocation. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
The company I work for does not own a single server. It does not run an own network. SaaS gets used. I guess about 20 SaaS solutions get used. Do we have an "Intranet"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guettli ( talk • contribs) 13:55, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Is there an alternative image or a translated version of the current image available? The current image is in turkish, which makes it difficult to understand, especially on ENWiki. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 19:02, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Intranet article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
There are distinct mean from the network view and website view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ? ( talk • contribs) ?
The dates entered here seems to be old by IT standards. If you are knowledgeable on this topic, please check it for outdated information.
In view of the seriousness of recent site hacks (Russians, Anonymous), please explain if this kind of system is secure from external attacks. If so, how? If not, why not? Thank you for your time, Wordreader ( talk) 22:43, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
There was old merge tag for a proposed merge of Enterprise private network into this article. The discussion wasn't created, so I'm doing it here. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 15:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
I believe that there should either be a merge, and have Enterprise private network re-direct here with a message saying why this should happen, or additional information on Enterprise private network for a clear distinction between the two 64.16.149.178 ( talk) 14:05, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm doing this merge now. Power~enwiki ( talk) 03:35, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
I would like to propose a small edit to the "Intranet Software" section of this article. In particular, I would propose that the following section:
"In 2018, there is a range of intranet software in use. They can be placed into a few different categories such as enterprise social networks like Workplace by Facebook, traditional intranet like Microsoft Sharepoint."
Be rewritten as:
"As of 2019, a wide variety of intranet software is in use. They can be placed into a few different categories, including enterprise social networks like Workplace by Facebook and traditional intranets like Microsoft SharePoint or Liferay."
You can view more details about Liferay's intranet offering here: https://www.liferay.com/solutions/intranets. User:Spintendo, User:ToBeFree or C.Fred is this something one of you can help with?
Please note that I am a Liferay employee.
Yotaml2 ( talk) 01:31, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi
Yotaml2, your analysis about the reliability of the sources is correct; I must have been blind.
About WP:NRSNVNA, the treatment of unsourced information in Wikipedia outside of biographies is usually not as strict as described in that essay. The essay also seems to focus on articles and notability, not the relevancy of specific sections within a non-biographical established article. A guideline that partly counters the essay can be found at WP:NNC; the verifiability policy also explicitly mentions the "citation needed" tag at WP:UNSOURCED and WP:FAILEDVERIFICATION. When in doubt, these statements are usually considered to have higher acceptance in the broader community than an essay.
I have done a bit of research regarding the three sources you've mentioned. Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spam/LinkReports/happeo.com and Special:Contributions/Roowright may be interesting. Three users, Iloveintranet ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Jacker333 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Roowright ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), have apparently only registered to add promotional links to this article. Thank you very much for discovering that problem.
I would normally, keeping WP:POINT in mind, strongly advise against deleting the section "Intranet software" as a part or result of this discussion. Instead, I would normally remove only the citations from the article (current revision is 872486997) and replace them by maintenance tags like {{ disputed inline}} and {{ citation needed}}. However, because the spam problem is so egregious, I will completely undo the following two edits:
Maybe other editors will agree to lower requirements. I personally would be uncomfortable with re-introducing similar statements unless we have an openly accessible 2019 source that provides reliable, objective data about the current market allocation. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
The company I work for does not own a single server. It does not run an own network. SaaS gets used. I guess about 20 SaaS solutions get used. Do we have an "Intranet"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guettli ( talk • contribs) 13:55, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Is there an alternative image or a translated version of the current image available? The current image is in turkish, which makes it difficult to understand, especially on ENWiki. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 19:02, 16 August 2023 (UTC)