From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'm not sure I'd agree with calling this article a stub. It's an obscure one mile long highway servicing a small city in upstate New York. Three paragraphs may be adequate coverage. I've seen much longer and more important highways covered with shorter articles. -- Ithacagorges 07:27, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

This article is a stub because it does not meet the standards set forth in the WikiProject above. -- Rschen7754 23:24, September 11, 2005 (UTC)

The Kingston Traffic Circle probably deserves an article of its own, as it was reconstructed in 2000 to be the first modern roundabout in NYS. Triskele Jim 19:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Opose merge

I've seen some oppose merge, so I think Its better not to merge. Althoguh I-587 entirly concurs with NY 28; I-587 have its own information to be kept 2 seperate page.Also the development manager wants us not to worry about the space and page length. Some page may not ever get past 2 pages long, and why oes this matter?-- Freewayguy Call? Fish 23:17, 21 July 2008 (UTC) reply

What about disccusion on this?-- Freeway 1 9 23:22, 14 October 2008 (UTC) reply

I have reverted the split of I-587 from NY 28. My rationale for doing so is at Talk:New York State Route 28. Further discussion on this issue should be placed there. – T M F 19:26, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'm not sure I'd agree with calling this article a stub. It's an obscure one mile long highway servicing a small city in upstate New York. Three paragraphs may be adequate coverage. I've seen much longer and more important highways covered with shorter articles. -- Ithacagorges 07:27, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

This article is a stub because it does not meet the standards set forth in the WikiProject above. -- Rschen7754 23:24, September 11, 2005 (UTC)

The Kingston Traffic Circle probably deserves an article of its own, as it was reconstructed in 2000 to be the first modern roundabout in NYS. Triskele Jim 19:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Opose merge

I've seen some oppose merge, so I think Its better not to merge. Althoguh I-587 entirly concurs with NY 28; I-587 have its own information to be kept 2 seperate page.Also the development manager wants us not to worry about the space and page length. Some page may not ever get past 2 pages long, and why oes this matter?-- Freewayguy Call? Fish 23:17, 21 July 2008 (UTC) reply

What about disccusion on this?-- Freeway 1 9 23:22, 14 October 2008 (UTC) reply

I have reverted the split of I-587 from NY 28. My rationale for doing so is at Talk:New York State Route 28. Further discussion on this issue should be placed there. – T M F 19:26, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook