![]() | This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 23 August 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Sanctions against North Korea to International sanctions against North Korea. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Here is one link that lists all the sanctions by US on NK: https://www.state.gov/e/eb/tfs/spi/northkorea/ . It may be helpful in improving the content of this article. Thank you. ( talk) user:Al83tito 05:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
ImperialMilitaryWatch.com is not a reliable source. At a quick glance it looks like a reputable magazine (and in fact the URL http://imperialmilitarywatch.com/ gets forwarded to the much more respectable-sounding http://militarywatchmagazine.com), there is no masthead; the "about" page gives no indication of who is behind the website. There's no indication of corporate ownership or association with some organization like a research institute or a think tank. Their Facebook link is broken, their other supposed social media links lead back to their own website. That's not how reliable sources are built. Even if the supposed magazine were reliable, the article by Abt is labeled "The statements, views and opinions expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Military Watch Magazine." - it's an opinion piece which the publisher explicitly disowns. It isn't significant enough to be mentioned on Wikipedia. Huon ( talk) 01:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
The lead right now is cumbersome and it's hard to tell just what the important points are about the history of sanctions against NK. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 14:52, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
The flow this article is cumbersome. I'm suggesting that the different paragraphs should be put into a table for a better overview of said paragraphs.
Asabiyya ( talk) 15:31, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
In the section on the United States, all content is ordered chronologically. I was wondering if it would be appropriate to break such a pattern in the interest of relevancy. The proposed change would be to move the final sentence (about the US reconsidering a travel ban) to the end of the second paragraph (where the travel ban is initially discussed). Would this be a relevant/welcome change? Nolandanley ( talk) 22:06, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Move History6042 ( talk) 17:52, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Sanctions against North Korea → International sanctions against North Korea – Per WP:CONSISTENT, similar to other titles such as International sanctions during the Russo-Ukrainian War, International sanctions during the Russian invasion of Ukraine and International sanctions during apartheid. The term has significant use by sources and sanctions have been sanctions by international organizations, such as the United Nations Security Council. NoonIcarus ( talk) 14:48, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
The Panel of Experts has been discontinued by a Russian veto, Jack Upland ( talk) 20:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 23 August 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Sanctions against North Korea to International sanctions against North Korea. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Here is one link that lists all the sanctions by US on NK: https://www.state.gov/e/eb/tfs/spi/northkorea/ . It may be helpful in improving the content of this article. Thank you. ( talk) user:Al83tito 05:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
ImperialMilitaryWatch.com is not a reliable source. At a quick glance it looks like a reputable magazine (and in fact the URL http://imperialmilitarywatch.com/ gets forwarded to the much more respectable-sounding http://militarywatchmagazine.com), there is no masthead; the "about" page gives no indication of who is behind the website. There's no indication of corporate ownership or association with some organization like a research institute or a think tank. Their Facebook link is broken, their other supposed social media links lead back to their own website. That's not how reliable sources are built. Even if the supposed magazine were reliable, the article by Abt is labeled "The statements, views and opinions expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Military Watch Magazine." - it's an opinion piece which the publisher explicitly disowns. It isn't significant enough to be mentioned on Wikipedia. Huon ( talk) 01:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
The lead right now is cumbersome and it's hard to tell just what the important points are about the history of sanctions against NK. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 14:52, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
The flow this article is cumbersome. I'm suggesting that the different paragraphs should be put into a table for a better overview of said paragraphs.
Asabiyya ( talk) 15:31, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
In the section on the United States, all content is ordered chronologically. I was wondering if it would be appropriate to break such a pattern in the interest of relevancy. The proposed change would be to move the final sentence (about the US reconsidering a travel ban) to the end of the second paragraph (where the travel ban is initially discussed). Would this be a relevant/welcome change? Nolandanley ( talk) 22:06, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Move History6042 ( talk) 17:52, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Sanctions against North Korea → International sanctions against North Korea – Per WP:CONSISTENT, similar to other titles such as International sanctions during the Russo-Ukrainian War, International sanctions during the Russian invasion of Ukraine and International sanctions during apartheid. The term has significant use by sources and sanctions have been sanctions by international organizations, such as the United Nations Security Council. NoonIcarus ( talk) 14:48, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
The Panel of Experts has been discontinued by a Russian veto, Jack Upland ( talk) 20:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)