![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
There is no "international reactions to the JFK assasination" article, neither one concerning the assasination of Gandhi. Yet, here we do have one about "Princess Bhutto". The amount of honors accorded a woman who got kicked out of office twice on verified corruption charges is more than sickening. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.61.54.93 ( talk) 11:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Here is a problem, do the House Speaker and the Senste majority leader, who do represent the United States legislative branch or go into the non-governmental part. This is a problem when many running for the President are currently in the U.S. Senate. Richardkselby ( talk) 03:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Many U.S. Presidential candidated offered their opinions on the matter, should they be included? Richardkselby ( talk) 22:01, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
I tried to do so, but I'm not too good at Wiki code, so help Richardkselby ( talk) 01:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Someone needs to copy over the links from the other page. I'm not sure how to do it. S♦s♦e♦b♦a♦l♦l♦o♦s (Merry Christmas!) 22:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Again, problems with the references but I can't find the error in the code. Someone please have a look. -- Tone 13:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I think it's important to add that Bush claimed that he would bring bin Laden to justice but months later he was stating that catching bin Laden isn't a priority. This would allow a reader to realize that Bush has a tendency to change his mind quickly in matters of security. Reinoe ( talk) 22:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
I added the Dutch reaction but it doesn't appear in the article :S Baldrick90 ( talk) 00:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
This could be a big issue with this article. I'm noticing that not only the Netherlands reaction source, but others are sourced in different languages as well. As an English-speaking editor, on the English Wikipedia, how am I supposed to verify a source citation if it's in Dutch!? (Although I AM 1/4 Dutch, I don't speak the language.) We need to find English translations of each, if we can... Edit Centric ( talk) 00:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Is this template really appropriate, since this page really should only have one article linking to it (the main article on Bhutto's assassination -- which it does)? Ashdog137 ( talk) 00:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
are there any nations of importance to the War on Terror or the United Nations that haven't publicly reacted yet? Kingturtle ( talk) 05:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Do we really need this? Cant this just be summarized by world condemns assasination? This seems hardly useful, unless there are exceptions where any specific country congratulates the attackers, then yes, that would need mentioning, but otherwise 50 countries basically saying the same thing seems like a monumental waste of time, and Im sorry for being a dick about this, since it seems a lot of effort has gone to it.
My opinion is to just remove the whole thing, merge it with the assasination artile, summarize it to a sentence or two about how the world views it, and be done with it. Four years from now, no one will think, "I wonder what Netherlands thought about the attacks, *checks*, oh, they condemned it, but I wonder what SOUTH KOREA thought..*checks*...same, but wait, what about Saudi Arabia! *checks*" 213.42.2.24 ( talk) 08:15, 29 December 2007 (UTC) MADali
I moved this from International reaction to the Benazir Bhutto assassination to maintain consistency with the other article. ~ Enviroboy Talk Contribs - 08:20, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Is the Holy See a NGO? The quote is even explicitly referred to Tarcisio Bertone, which is correctly addressed as Secretary of State. No NGO has a Secretary of State. IMVHO it should be listed under Europe, just like any other state. What do you think? Snowolf How can I help? 10:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
There seems to be continuing ambiguity over what sources for comment we're including -- some entries quote opposition leaders, others have had opposition comments removed. Some even quoted candidates, but I think I caught and eliminated all those.
For the sake of argument, I think there's some distinction between leaders of opposition parties and Leaders of the Opposition (where such a position officially exists within the legislature). I'd be more inclined to include the latter than the former; however, I'd still just barely lean towards excluding both.
In my opinion, included sources should be: heads of state, heads of government, chiefs of legislature (where not head of gov't), and chief diplomatic agencies/officers. Excluded should be candidates for office, other executive officials (unless in the capacity of spokesman for one of the above, and then only unless/until one of the above releases a statement), other legislative officials (including party chiefs, committee chairmen, LotO, etc.), and the like.
I'm going to be bold and make this change now; I'd still like to hear your thoughts/suggestions/comments, though -- I brought this up earlier, but received no subsequent comment. Ashdog137 ( talk) 02:42, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Amnesty International.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
International reaction to the assassination of Benazir Bhutto. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on International reaction to the assassination of Benazir Bhutto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:20, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 30 external links on International reaction to the assassination of Benazir Bhutto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.aps.dz/an/pageview.asp?ID=180536{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.nepalnews.com/archive/2007/dec/dec28/news13.php{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.lankabusinessonline.com/fullstory.php?newsID=1060031754&no_view=1&SEARCH_TERM=33{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://w01.international.gc.ca/minpub/Publication.aspx?isRedirect=True&publication_id=385720&language=E&docnumber=186{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.cwwl.org/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:14, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
There is no "international reactions to the JFK assasination" article, neither one concerning the assasination of Gandhi. Yet, here we do have one about "Princess Bhutto". The amount of honors accorded a woman who got kicked out of office twice on verified corruption charges is more than sickening. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.61.54.93 ( talk) 11:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Here is a problem, do the House Speaker and the Senste majority leader, who do represent the United States legislative branch or go into the non-governmental part. This is a problem when many running for the President are currently in the U.S. Senate. Richardkselby ( talk) 03:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Many U.S. Presidential candidated offered their opinions on the matter, should they be included? Richardkselby ( talk) 22:01, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
I tried to do so, but I'm not too good at Wiki code, so help Richardkselby ( talk) 01:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Someone needs to copy over the links from the other page. I'm not sure how to do it. S♦s♦e♦b♦a♦l♦l♦o♦s (Merry Christmas!) 22:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Again, problems with the references but I can't find the error in the code. Someone please have a look. -- Tone 13:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I think it's important to add that Bush claimed that he would bring bin Laden to justice but months later he was stating that catching bin Laden isn't a priority. This would allow a reader to realize that Bush has a tendency to change his mind quickly in matters of security. Reinoe ( talk) 22:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
I added the Dutch reaction but it doesn't appear in the article :S Baldrick90 ( talk) 00:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
This could be a big issue with this article. I'm noticing that not only the Netherlands reaction source, but others are sourced in different languages as well. As an English-speaking editor, on the English Wikipedia, how am I supposed to verify a source citation if it's in Dutch!? (Although I AM 1/4 Dutch, I don't speak the language.) We need to find English translations of each, if we can... Edit Centric ( talk) 00:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Is this template really appropriate, since this page really should only have one article linking to it (the main article on Bhutto's assassination -- which it does)? Ashdog137 ( talk) 00:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
are there any nations of importance to the War on Terror or the United Nations that haven't publicly reacted yet? Kingturtle ( talk) 05:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Do we really need this? Cant this just be summarized by world condemns assasination? This seems hardly useful, unless there are exceptions where any specific country congratulates the attackers, then yes, that would need mentioning, but otherwise 50 countries basically saying the same thing seems like a monumental waste of time, and Im sorry for being a dick about this, since it seems a lot of effort has gone to it.
My opinion is to just remove the whole thing, merge it with the assasination artile, summarize it to a sentence or two about how the world views it, and be done with it. Four years from now, no one will think, "I wonder what Netherlands thought about the attacks, *checks*, oh, they condemned it, but I wonder what SOUTH KOREA thought..*checks*...same, but wait, what about Saudi Arabia! *checks*" 213.42.2.24 ( talk) 08:15, 29 December 2007 (UTC) MADali
I moved this from International reaction to the Benazir Bhutto assassination to maintain consistency with the other article. ~ Enviroboy Talk Contribs - 08:20, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Is the Holy See a NGO? The quote is even explicitly referred to Tarcisio Bertone, which is correctly addressed as Secretary of State. No NGO has a Secretary of State. IMVHO it should be listed under Europe, just like any other state. What do you think? Snowolf How can I help? 10:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
There seems to be continuing ambiguity over what sources for comment we're including -- some entries quote opposition leaders, others have had opposition comments removed. Some even quoted candidates, but I think I caught and eliminated all those.
For the sake of argument, I think there's some distinction between leaders of opposition parties and Leaders of the Opposition (where such a position officially exists within the legislature). I'd be more inclined to include the latter than the former; however, I'd still just barely lean towards excluding both.
In my opinion, included sources should be: heads of state, heads of government, chiefs of legislature (where not head of gov't), and chief diplomatic agencies/officers. Excluded should be candidates for office, other executive officials (unless in the capacity of spokesman for one of the above, and then only unless/until one of the above releases a statement), other legislative officials (including party chiefs, committee chairmen, LotO, etc.), and the like.
I'm going to be bold and make this change now; I'd still like to hear your thoughts/suggestions/comments, though -- I brought this up earlier, but received no subsequent comment. Ashdog137 ( talk) 02:42, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Amnesty International.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
International reaction to the assassination of Benazir Bhutto. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on International reaction to the assassination of Benazir Bhutto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:20, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 30 external links on International reaction to the assassination of Benazir Bhutto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.aps.dz/an/pageview.asp?ID=180536{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.nepalnews.com/archive/2007/dec/dec28/news13.php{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.lankabusinessonline.com/fullstory.php?newsID=1060031754&no_view=1&SEARCH_TERM=33{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://w01.international.gc.ca/minpub/Publication.aspx?isRedirect=True&publication_id=385720&language=E&docnumber=186{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.cwwl.org/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:14, 15 November 2017 (UTC)