![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
After reviewing this article, I have concluded that it features language which is overly technical, and even pompous. In light of recent and massive additions, it occurs to me that this may have been a subtle and purposeful irony. If this is indeed the case, I would like to applaud the responsible party for their creativity. However, the article must nevertheless be brought back in line with the Manual of Style (MOS). I am leaving here a link to the relevant guideline. Atomic putty? Rien! (talk) ( talk) 14:43, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
I'll be working to clean this page up by bringing it "in line" with the MoS and bring it up todate.
Please let me know if you have any suggestions or have anything to add. RationalAndOptimistic ( talk) 22:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
After reviewing this article, I have concluded that it features language which is overly technical, and even pompous. In light of recent and massive additions, it occurs to me that this may have been a subtle and purposeful irony. If this is indeed the case, I would like to applaud the responsible party for their creativity. However, the article must nevertheless be brought back in line with the Manual of Style (MOS). I am leaving here a link to the relevant guideline. Atomic putty? Rien! (talk) ( talk) 14:43, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
I'll be working to clean this page up by bringing it "in line" with the MoS and bring it up todate.
Please let me know if you have any suggestions or have anything to add. RationalAndOptimistic ( talk) 22:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)