![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wow, I wonder if this is the longest article name on wikipedia or what? The Ungovernable Force 07:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
This article is clearly written from a LGBT-friendly POV. Let's please remember WP:NPOV and keep in mind that just because someone doesn't agree with Church teaching doesn't mean there shouldn't be balanced presentation. 65.182.51.67 05:33, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
The article states that "a person openly supporting LGBT rights organisations" would be barred from the priesthood. Given that the Catechism states that people with "deep-seated homosexual tendencies" must be "accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided" ( Catechism of the Catholic Church, para. 2358), support of LGBT rights organisations would seem to be justified, since "gay culture" doesn't mean the same thing as gay (or LGBT) rights. 134.226.1.194 09:55, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Someone put an uncited comment in the lead paragraph about an "Austrian sex scandal". There was no indication what this was about, and all the links were to general terms like "Austria". So I removed it. -- John Nagle 07:00, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Someone tagged the article with a "notability" tag, with no explaination. This instruction was written up in the New York Times, The Guardian, and many other major papers, and is so cited. It set off a major controversy and is still an issue. -- John Nagle ( talk) 06:22, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
I suggest that we merge this page into the larger article on homosexuality and the Catholic priesthood. My reasoning is that it provides a lot of detail on recent Vatican interventions on discipline - but focuses just on one specific document. By merging it into the other article it will improve the other article considerably in terms of context. Contaldo80 ( talk) 08:27, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Instruction Concerning the Criteria for the Discernment of Vocations with regard to Persons with Homosexual Tendencies in view of their Admission to the Seminary and to Holy Orders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:09, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Instruction Concerning the Criteria for the Discernment of Vocations with regard to Persons with Homosexual Tendencies in view of their Admission to the Seminary and to Holy Orders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wow, I wonder if this is the longest article name on wikipedia or what? The Ungovernable Force 07:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
This article is clearly written from a LGBT-friendly POV. Let's please remember WP:NPOV and keep in mind that just because someone doesn't agree with Church teaching doesn't mean there shouldn't be balanced presentation. 65.182.51.67 05:33, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
The article states that "a person openly supporting LGBT rights organisations" would be barred from the priesthood. Given that the Catechism states that people with "deep-seated homosexual tendencies" must be "accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided" ( Catechism of the Catholic Church, para. 2358), support of LGBT rights organisations would seem to be justified, since "gay culture" doesn't mean the same thing as gay (or LGBT) rights. 134.226.1.194 09:55, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Someone put an uncited comment in the lead paragraph about an "Austrian sex scandal". There was no indication what this was about, and all the links were to general terms like "Austria". So I removed it. -- John Nagle 07:00, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Someone tagged the article with a "notability" tag, with no explaination. This instruction was written up in the New York Times, The Guardian, and many other major papers, and is so cited. It set off a major controversy and is still an issue. -- John Nagle ( talk) 06:22, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
I suggest that we merge this page into the larger article on homosexuality and the Catholic priesthood. My reasoning is that it provides a lot of detail on recent Vatican interventions on discipline - but focuses just on one specific document. By merging it into the other article it will improve the other article considerably in terms of context. Contaldo80 ( talk) 08:27, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Instruction Concerning the Criteria for the Discernment of Vocations with regard to Persons with Homosexual Tendencies in view of their Admission to the Seminary and to Holy Orders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:09, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Instruction Concerning the Criteria for the Discernment of Vocations with regard to Persons with Homosexual Tendencies in view of their Admission to the Seminary and to Holy Orders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)