Inocybe saliceticola is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 18, 2013.
Article milestones Date Process Result June 20, 2012 Good article nominee Listed September 8, 2012 Featured article candidate Promoted
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " Did you know?" column on June 27, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Scandinavian fungus Inocybe saliceticola can grow among mosses such as heart-leaved spear moss?
Current status: Featured article

This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Fungi Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Inocybe saliceticola/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sasata ( talk · contribs) 19:09, 18 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Got this one. Comments soon. Sasata ( talk) 19:09, 18 June 2012 (UTC) reply

• usually we use botanical term division instead of phylum in the taxobox for fungi (although technically either is fine)
  • Done. J Milburn ( talk) 00:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• why not keep units consistent in the lead (40 millimetres cap vs. 6.2 cm stems)
  • Done. J Milburn ( talk) 14:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• "found in moist habitats" doesn't tell us if it grows on the ground, on leaves, on decaying wood, etc.
  • I've added a note in the second paragraph of the lead. J Milburn ( talk) 14:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• "The stem connects to a large and well-defined "bulb" at the base." Instead of saying it "connects to" (makes me think of it as a separate structure), how about a wording like this: "The base of the stem is a well-defined "bulb""?
  • Gone for "At the base of the stem is a large and well-defined "bulb"." Better? J Milburn ( talk) 14:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
    • Good. Sasata ( talk) 16:42, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• link spore
  • Done. J Milburn ( talk) 14:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• Findland
  • Done. J Milburn ( talk) 00:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• "other species which would otherwise" which->that
  • Done. J Milburn ( talk) 00:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• link Karstenia
  • Done. J Milburn ( talk) 00:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• "the shore of the lake Pahakala"
  • Done. J Milburn ( talk) 00:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• in Taxonomy, it's a bit confusing to refer to the tree as both beech and willow
  • No idea how that happened. J Milburn ( talk) 00:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• "an umbo which is" which->that
  • Done. J Milburn ( talk) 00:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• "towards the cap margins" margin
  • Done. J Milburn ( talk) 00:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• (funny looking spores) ... "This is perhaps due to poor weather." Poor weather is vague; does this mean dry weather (I think a fungus would think dry weather to be poor). Meh, never mind, the authors are equally vague!
• "The tip is encrusted with crystal-like structures and sometimes bends," the tip is encrusted with bends?
  • Well spotted. J Milburn ( talk) 14:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• cystudia spelling
  • Done. J Milburn ( talk) 00:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• "The species also features" I'd specify "fruit body" or "mushroom"
  • Done. J Milburn ( talk) 00:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• "and often grow in clusters." -> how about "and are often arranged in clusters."?
  • Done. J Milburn ( talk) 00:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• should gloss excrescence
  • I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean. J Milburn ( talk) 00:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
    • Gloss: "A translation or explanation of a word or phrase" :) Sasata ( talk) 16:42, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• "I. hirculus has been recorded growing near to I. saliceticola,"
  • Done. J Milburn ( talk) 00:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• for our general audience, you might want to spell out ITS and mention that it's ribosomal DNA. I think that molecular phylogenetics is a better (more targeted) piped link in this case than genetic testing
  • Gone for "[[Molecular phylogenetics|Phylogenetic analysis]] of the respective [[internal transcribed spacer]] sequences has confirmed that it is ''I. obtusiuscula'' and ''I. saliceticola'' are separate species." J Milburn ( talk) 14:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• wikt or gloss fibrillose
  • Added a definition. J Milburn ( talk) 14:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• "while other trees which the species" which->that
  • Done. J Milburn ( talk) 14:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• "The species is found most typically in moist thickets" species->fungus (several species were discussed in the previous sentence)
  • Spelt out the specific name. J Milburn ( talk) 14:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• detrius -> detritus
  • Done. J Milburn ( talk) 00:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• might be worthwhile to mention that there's been over 150 species of Inocybe found in Scandinavia
  • Done; however, I've also switched around mentions of "Scandinavia" to "Nordic countries". According to our article, I was actually using the word wrong... J Milburn ( talk) 14:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
    • Hmmm, did not know that ... now I'll have to find and correct the instances I've used this incorrectly ... Sasata ( talk) 16:42, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• Tried contacting the authors for a pic?
  • I contacted Ukka Vauras, but I was unable to find contact details for Katri Kokkonen. I also considered drawing my own sketch of the spores, but I wasn't sure whether that would be academically sound, seeing as I'd be basing my sketch off someone else's. What do you think?
    • I think it'd be ok here, as the original spore pics are simple sketches anyway, so it would be easy to draw them accurately. Would certainly be a useful encyclopaedic addition, seeing as spore shape is a defining characteristic for this species. Sasata ( talk) 16:42, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks very much for your review; it's late, so I've only picked off some of the easier points, rather than risk messing something up. J Milburn ( talk) 00:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply

• You're welcome, it's my pleasure. The article meets the GA criteria; passing now. (p.s. I've seen a few more Inocybe pics show up at MO for which we don't have articles, in case you're seeking further fibrecap inspiration.) Sasata ( talk) 16:42, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply

I think that mushrooms should have a word about edibility or toxicity. Especially if there are toxic species in the genus, while others are rumored to be eaten. 80.254.148.123 ( talk) 08:14, 18 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Sadly, the sources don't mention it. It's probably poisonous, though almost certainly not deadly. J Milburn ( talk) 10:19, 18 April 2013 (UTC) reply