![]() | Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1988 video game) was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not sure how to do this, but my correction was over ruled and the old page reinstated. (I don't even know why I edit anything on here since someone always thinks they are correct, and if I am not, please explain why I am not.)
The 'edit' in question is regards to this is suppose to be the first Indy movie made into a video game, when 'Raiders of the Lost Ark' came out at least two years prior on the Atari 2600. Am I not correct? Then the statement that Temple of Doom was the first is WRONG. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.96.75.40 ( talk) 23:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Here is the sources: Go here... right on Wikipedia itself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raiders_of_the_Lost_Ark_(video_game), here is one as well: http://www.mobygames.com/game/atari-2600/raiders-of-the-lost-ark. Here is another one: http://www.atariage.com/catalog_page.html?CatalogID=62¤tPage=5, released in 1982, a FULL two years before Temple of Doom. I am old enough to know when I originally bought it... in 1982.
Now if you may, remove that text if you want to make Wikipedia an actual factual reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.96.75.40 ( talk) 00:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, sorry about the trouble and the reaction.
No problem. In addition, I was being careful to avoid attacking you (though I was mad), but I apologize if there were any hard feelings. Per WP:TPG though, it's not a good idea to edit others comments on talk pages, but since your intention was good and it betters the project, I say it's a good time to ignore all rules. Cheers, CP 01:02, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Wow. I'd say this is pretty near to GA as it is. The sources, images, neutrality and stability are all pretty much there. It was a really interesting read, though there are still a couple of points before I think you can send it off to GAC:
Done Cheers,
CP
22:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Done Cheers,
CP
23:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Done Cheers,
CP
22:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Done I didn't think so either, not sure why I left them there. Cheers,
CP
22:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Doing... Nothing worthwhile as of yet. I'm going to go ahead and nominate this for GA, but I'll keep an eye out. Cheers,
CP
01:17, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Done I checked, and it requires you to submit your changes so that the person who maintains the page can review them before they are posted. Cheers,
CP 22:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
That's all I can think of for now.
Una Laguna
Talk
20:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Why is the lead and the infobox telling it was only released for NES when the MobyGames entry lists all these platforms: Amiga, Amstrad CPC, Apple II, Atari ST, Commodore 64, DOS, MSX, ZX Spectrum? -- Mika1h 11:07, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Nothing bad to say about this article. There was one poorly written sentence that may have been a result of two sentences melded together, but I simply removed the material that didn't make sense. NF24( radio me! Editor review) 22:50, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Result: delisted MuZemike 08:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Instead of delisting myself, I am putting this up for reassessment to see if it can be salvaged as a GA and since there has been a couple of recent edits to the article. Here are the reasons I think this should be delisted:
MuZemike 20:52, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Reviewer: S Masters ( talk) 15:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Comments:
The above are my only issues with this article. I will put in On Hold for up to seven days so that we can work to resolve these issues, and make this a better article.
Summary: Thank you for your work and clarification. I am now satisfied that the article meets all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to list it as such. Nice work! -- S Masters ( talk) 05:41, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Creating a centralized discussion for the use of extra images (as seen in the history). The only argument made in favour of the images inclusion has been that they were in the article when the article passed GA, in spite of the fact that none of the images' rationales actually address the content of the image or its actual use. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 04:07, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
The sardonic tone above was a product of my account being hijacked for several minutes; however, NARH's comments are valid and thus deleting my own would make their's nonsensical. I will produce a proper response tomorrow to NARH's (valid) concerns tomrrow. Canadian Paul 04:41, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. The1337gamer ( talk) 14:31, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (NES video game) → Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1988 video game) – WP:NCVGDAB says to disambiguate by release year before platform. The other release ( Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1985 video game) is 1985 so this would be better for parallelism too. Please {{ ping}} me if you'd like a response. czar 15:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. — Amakuru ( talk) 09:58, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
The game is based on the arcade game", "
The resulting product (...) kept the same underlying premise and style"). The "Version history" makes it clear that it's not a strict port but more of an enhanced remake. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 21:41, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1988 video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Result: delisted MuZemike 08:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Instead of delisting myself, I am putting this up for reassessment to see if it can be salvaged as a GA and since there has been a couple of recent edits to the article. Here are the reasons I think this should be delisted:
MuZemike 20:52, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() | Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1988 video game) was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not sure how to do this, but my correction was over ruled and the old page reinstated. (I don't even know why I edit anything on here since someone always thinks they are correct, and if I am not, please explain why I am not.)
The 'edit' in question is regards to this is suppose to be the first Indy movie made into a video game, when 'Raiders of the Lost Ark' came out at least two years prior on the Atari 2600. Am I not correct? Then the statement that Temple of Doom was the first is WRONG. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.96.75.40 ( talk) 23:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Here is the sources: Go here... right on Wikipedia itself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raiders_of_the_Lost_Ark_(video_game), here is one as well: http://www.mobygames.com/game/atari-2600/raiders-of-the-lost-ark. Here is another one: http://www.atariage.com/catalog_page.html?CatalogID=62¤tPage=5, released in 1982, a FULL two years before Temple of Doom. I am old enough to know when I originally bought it... in 1982.
Now if you may, remove that text if you want to make Wikipedia an actual factual reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.96.75.40 ( talk) 00:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, sorry about the trouble and the reaction.
No problem. In addition, I was being careful to avoid attacking you (though I was mad), but I apologize if there were any hard feelings. Per WP:TPG though, it's not a good idea to edit others comments on talk pages, but since your intention was good and it betters the project, I say it's a good time to ignore all rules. Cheers, CP 01:02, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Wow. I'd say this is pretty near to GA as it is. The sources, images, neutrality and stability are all pretty much there. It was a really interesting read, though there are still a couple of points before I think you can send it off to GAC:
Done Cheers,
CP
22:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Done Cheers,
CP
23:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Done Cheers,
CP
22:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Done I didn't think so either, not sure why I left them there. Cheers,
CP
22:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Doing... Nothing worthwhile as of yet. I'm going to go ahead and nominate this for GA, but I'll keep an eye out. Cheers,
CP
01:17, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Done I checked, and it requires you to submit your changes so that the person who maintains the page can review them before they are posted. Cheers,
CP 22:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
That's all I can think of for now.
Una Laguna
Talk
20:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Why is the lead and the infobox telling it was only released for NES when the MobyGames entry lists all these platforms: Amiga, Amstrad CPC, Apple II, Atari ST, Commodore 64, DOS, MSX, ZX Spectrum? -- Mika1h 11:07, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Nothing bad to say about this article. There was one poorly written sentence that may have been a result of two sentences melded together, but I simply removed the material that didn't make sense. NF24( radio me! Editor review) 22:50, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Result: delisted MuZemike 08:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Instead of delisting myself, I am putting this up for reassessment to see if it can be salvaged as a GA and since there has been a couple of recent edits to the article. Here are the reasons I think this should be delisted:
MuZemike 20:52, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Reviewer: S Masters ( talk) 15:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Comments:
The above are my only issues with this article. I will put in On Hold for up to seven days so that we can work to resolve these issues, and make this a better article.
Summary: Thank you for your work and clarification. I am now satisfied that the article meets all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to list it as such. Nice work! -- S Masters ( talk) 05:41, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Creating a centralized discussion for the use of extra images (as seen in the history). The only argument made in favour of the images inclusion has been that they were in the article when the article passed GA, in spite of the fact that none of the images' rationales actually address the content of the image or its actual use. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 04:07, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
The sardonic tone above was a product of my account being hijacked for several minutes; however, NARH's comments are valid and thus deleting my own would make their's nonsensical. I will produce a proper response tomorrow to NARH's (valid) concerns tomrrow. Canadian Paul 04:41, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. The1337gamer ( talk) 14:31, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (NES video game) → Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1988 video game) – WP:NCVGDAB says to disambiguate by release year before platform. The other release ( Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1985 video game) is 1985 so this would be better for parallelism too. Please {{ ping}} me if you'd like a response. czar 15:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. — Amakuru ( talk) 09:58, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
The game is based on the arcade game", "
The resulting product (...) kept the same underlying premise and style"). The "Version history" makes it clear that it's not a strict port but more of an enhanced remake. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 21:41, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1988 video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Result: delisted MuZemike 08:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Instead of delisting myself, I am putting this up for reassessment to see if it can be salvaged as a GA and since there has been a couple of recent edits to the article. Here are the reasons I think this should be delisted:
MuZemike 20:52, 20 February 2009 (UTC)