This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. See also:
WikiProject Trains to do list and the
Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This redirect was accepted on 26 February 2009 by reviewer
MSGJ (
talk·contribs).
Comment: Posted this to the Trains Wikiproject, see if we can attract an experienced, knowledgeble editor, as locomotive types typically do have wikipedia articles. AKRadeckiSpeaketh21:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The first source has nothing about diesel locos, the second has nothing about WAG locos, though the sub page
http://irfca.org/faq/faq-specs.html has some details, in fact that page has more info available - why not use that.
Also actually searching 'wag locomotive' turns up more info. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
FengRail (
talk •
contribs)
Couple more points - From experience I've found that the railway name comes first - so I think the article should be named "Indian Railways WAG locomotives",, or "Indian Railways WAG class" also using the initials is common practice eg BR, DB, SNCF etc so perhaps it should be "IR WAG family of locomotives" or similar. A redirect can be easily made. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
FengRail (
talk •
contribs)
22:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I personally think it's inconsistent that every WAP and WAM class has it's own page while the WAGs are bunched up here, despite having very little similarities other than being electric and classified as WAG - the information is duplicated on pages for several WAG locomotives, in addition. I don't think this page is needed because of that.
ConnieC420 (
talk)
12:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC)reply
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. See also:
WikiProject Trains to do list and the
Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This redirect was accepted on 26 February 2009 by reviewer
MSGJ (
talk·contribs).
Comment: Posted this to the Trains Wikiproject, see if we can attract an experienced, knowledgeble editor, as locomotive types typically do have wikipedia articles. AKRadeckiSpeaketh21:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The first source has nothing about diesel locos, the second has nothing about WAG locos, though the sub page
http://irfca.org/faq/faq-specs.html has some details, in fact that page has more info available - why not use that.
Also actually searching 'wag locomotive' turns up more info. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
FengRail (
talk •
contribs)
Couple more points - From experience I've found that the railway name comes first - so I think the article should be named "Indian Railways WAG locomotives",, or "Indian Railways WAG class" also using the initials is common practice eg BR, DB, SNCF etc so perhaps it should be "IR WAG family of locomotives" or similar. A redirect can be easily made. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
FengRail (
talk •
contribs)
22:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I personally think it's inconsistent that every WAP and WAM class has it's own page while the WAGs are bunched up here, despite having very little similarities other than being electric and classified as WAG - the information is duplicated on pages for several WAG locomotives, in addition. I don't think this page is needed because of that.
ConnieC420 (
talk)
12:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC)reply