This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to
New Eskaton.
This article is written in
Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
Vice Regent: unlike most news stories, Op-Ed pieces even in well-known news sources do not receive editorial oversight: their authors can essentially say what they want. Therefore, they become unreliable sources for anything except the content of that selfsame Op-Ed, and inclusion is only appropriate if you can demonstrate why a particular person's opinion is notable.
Vanamonde (
talk)
17:37, 17 October 2016 (UTC)reply
What Vanamonde93 said. Plus, we need to be cognizant of the fact that by merely including a view on wikipedia, we give it credence and make it notable. That's an awesome responsibility :) and we need to be circumspect. --
regentspark (
comment)
17:55, 17 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Ok, but I've seen plenty of op-eds being used to say things like "Pakistan was behind this attack" at
Jaish-e-Mohammed,
2016 Uri attack etc. Each time that source is put in by Katuilya as "Analysts say Pakistan...". Why are those op-eds ok, but this one isn't?VRtalk20:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC)reply
For example, take a look at
this. Fair just wrote an op-ed in the Huffington Post. (The author, btw, has been
criticized for making false statements and using sources of low credibility). And this is just one example of an op-ed that has recently been used in India-Pakistan articles to accuse Pakistan of secretly orchestrating terror.VRtalk21:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)reply
I have been editing both of those articles and I have never seen the statement "Pakistan was behind this attack", much less written it myself! So I am afraid you will have to dig up the exact statement.
This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to
New Eskaton.
This article is written in
Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
Vice Regent: unlike most news stories, Op-Ed pieces even in well-known news sources do not receive editorial oversight: their authors can essentially say what they want. Therefore, they become unreliable sources for anything except the content of that selfsame Op-Ed, and inclusion is only appropriate if you can demonstrate why a particular person's opinion is notable.
Vanamonde (
talk)
17:37, 17 October 2016 (UTC)reply
What Vanamonde93 said. Plus, we need to be cognizant of the fact that by merely including a view on wikipedia, we give it credence and make it notable. That's an awesome responsibility :) and we need to be circumspect. --
regentspark (
comment)
17:55, 17 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Ok, but I've seen plenty of op-eds being used to say things like "Pakistan was behind this attack" at
Jaish-e-Mohammed,
2016 Uri attack etc. Each time that source is put in by Katuilya as "Analysts say Pakistan...". Why are those op-eds ok, but this one isn't?VRtalk20:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC)reply
For example, take a look at
this. Fair just wrote an op-ed in the Huffington Post. (The author, btw, has been
criticized for making false statements and using sources of low credibility). And this is just one example of an op-ed that has recently been used in India-Pakistan articles to accuse Pakistan of secretly orchestrating terror.VRtalk21:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)reply
I have been editing both of those articles and I have never seen the statement "Pakistan was behind this attack", much less written it myself! So I am afraid you will have to dig up the exact statement.