This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
In My City article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | In My City has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
The article has been created since reliable third party sources like NME magazine has confirmed that the song has gone for commercial release in iTunes music stores. Hence commercial viability is a testament of it being a single. — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 09:22, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
For Them who are against the article ,I want to say that the single had charted,it even topped national charts like nokia(problem is iTunes is not available. In India). morever ,it had charted #89 to #80 and later to #71.go and check ITunes top 100 pop songs.Chopra is also shooting official music video browse you will get the news.following are links which shows that the song had charted
Even Chopra had posted on her twitter account which contains charts photos Link http://twitter.com/teampriyanka/status/253184317524697088&sa=U&ei=qYB1UMmjA4jsrAey4IEo&ved=0CCAQFjAC&usg=AFQjCNFilkL4ZUJzBU8E31ZkUTMBKA_mlA
So the policy is to delete the article when it does not meet notability criteria,GO AND OPEN KATY PERRY album article KATY HUDSON and on her article it is clearly written "HER ALBUM KATY HUDON FAILED TO CHART" still her article is not deleted and a single which has charted few positions can't have one( Pks1142 ( talk) 04:45, 11 October 2012 (UTC))
Alright, there are some potential problems with the contents being added by Pks1142. Continuously adding content not supported by sources does not lead to a verifiable article. Sources which are dubious like Digital Spy etc are not exactly reliable, also adding content which are WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NPOV violation and WP:WAX. So those should be removed. Share your thoughts. — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 12:28, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Material not supported by the sources claimed
Release history
1. India September 14, 2012 Digital download
Claimed source: Singh, Prashant (2012-09-08). "Priyanka Chopra to release debut song for Indian fans first". Hindustan Times (HT Media Ltd). Retrieved 2012-09-14.
Problems
Digital download is not mentioned in the article
Source states, "The release of the full song and accompanying video for "In My City" are expected later this year."
Source states, "Chopra will be the featured artist for Thursday Night Kickoff which begins Sept. 13" - This is not a 'release' but a 'licensing deal' to be used for a TV show. 'Release' means being available to purchase.
2. India September 14, 2012 CD single
Claimed source: Raghavendra, Nandini (2012-09-12). "Priyanka Chopra releases single 'In my City', trends to number one position on Twitter". The Economic Times (The Times Group). Retrieved 2012-10-11.
Problems
Article is dated Sept 13
CD single is not mentioned in the article.
"Universal Music releases the single tommorrow for sales in India while Nokia India will provide exclusive downloads and Blenders Pride has chosen the song to be a key feature in their upcoming multi city tours." - The Universal Music portion seems good at first, the others are more of a 'promotional use'. But even the Universal so-called here 'release' must just be a portion of the song as later statement shows "Although the full song and video for 'In My City' are expected to be ready later in the year...".
3. Restore an ACTUAL release source for US (iTunes). A REAL release source SHOWING DATE available for purchase (release date) is better than any other that just says it is being sold.
That last comment brings me to my MOST concern regarding releases in India. Since it now in the past, why can't there be ACTUAL DIRECT sources shown (with the dates available).—
Iknow23 (
talk)
12:59, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Just an FYI for anyone not knowing this, please don't add references to the lead section of the article, when the same info is reliably sourced in the article body, as per WP:LEAD. — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
The above user just removed a whole chunk of edits from the article, giving reasons as "not needed". Well simply "not needed because they are present in body/another article" is simply not a reason for removing content. Please see WP:WAX. The contents removed were all verifiable by third party reliable sources and present the basic flow and the chronology of the events taking place related to this song, which is released recently. As time goes and more information is available, the present info will also change. Pre-emptive action based on WP:CRYSTAL is not appreciated here. User:Pks1142, state your reasonings here and reach a WP:CONSENSUS. — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 11:41, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
I have reverted the addition of "Erase" as a next single, which was added by Pks1142. As per the link provided, no where it says that "Erase" is the next single from Chopra. Its just a song recorded with The Chainsmokers, and is being released to iTunes. Might be even promotional. This is a case of WP:CRYSTAL. — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:57, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Does mixed reviews mean 4 negative and 1 positive????? I don't know if he is criticizing the song or applauding it.It gets bad impression from reception which says only negative things for songs.Positive for chopra's vocals suits for Chopra article.Fake accent??? Well Does it is Indian song
Its an English made with American accent In mind.How editor knows its fake,well had she ever seen her speaking.What reviews has to to do Indian lyrics ,does it need to be included in English song.Is there any rule that every artist from respective country must use their native language.It doesn't make sense though.( Pks1142 ( talk) 08:04, 16 November 2012 (UTC))
We should include overall thought for the song Your recent edit which says Its success will be based on promotional campaigns doesn't make sense as A song becomes hit only depend on listener.its has bad impression .( Pks1142 ( talk) 08:39, 16 November 2012 (UTC))
Ok let's discuss.( Pks1142 ( talk) 10:50, 16 November 2012 (UTC))
Seeing that many pop artists use music and reality-based videos to create awareness around their upcoming releases, Chopra's team planned to create different promotional contents, like interviews of the artist, and behind-the-scenes footage with long-and-short documentaries, that would be released to the internet. The videos and interviews would focus on Chopra's journey in becoming a pop artist. Since most of the top ten hits in India are mainly songs from Bollywood films—where the actors lip-synch to the song—Chopra's label wanted to promote her as the first Bollywood actress who can also sing. According to Lee Hawkins from The Wall Street Journal, "If Chopra is able to convincingly establish herself as a respected singer, she will be a pioneer in South Asia. Throughout 2011, Anthony Saleh, one of Carter's partners at Atom Factory Inc., worked closely with Chopra for several weeks. Beyond selling music, the team planned to use Chopra's popularity and tap into ancillary revenue streams such as corporate sponsorships, high-fashion modeling, film and television, concert touring, and music publishing. Saleh added that they also "plan on developing [Chopra] as a songwriter
![]() | It seems like this RFC is discussing two seperate things without really being distinct about it. One issue is if promotion in general is a subject that should be covered in song articles and the other is whether it should be in this article in particular. However, as a matter of what slim consensus there is here and a simpler matter of Wikipedia policy the answer is the same for both: Did the promotional efforts related to the song receive significant coverage from
reliable sources to the extent that covering it in the article will not lend it
undue weight? This is something that needs to be decided on a case by case basis, and in this case it appears there is a (weak) consensus that the promotional efforts made on this songs' behalf were sufficiently notable to be mentioned in the article.
|
Are promotional campaigns and strategies by labels irrelevant/not needed for a song article? — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 12:37, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Does it make sense that these are promotion.Clearly its all about who is planning,who thought what,what her team thought.My view is that it should be started directly as promotions started from this or that place.( Pks1142 ( talk) 13:57, 16 November 2012 (UTC))
Also someone's prediction that she will be a pioneer does it talk about promotion....huh...pls understand,we don't need to include someone's thought and PR skills.where are documentaries????only 1 behind the scenes video???? Is it new no....every next star releases these stuffs which are not nee.( Pks1142 ( talk) 04:45, 17 November 2012 (UTC))
Extended content
|
---|
Another 2K of content was again blatantly removed by User:Pks1142, without discussing in the talk page, when he has been asked so many times to do so. A closer look at the edit summaries makes me realise that this is a serious POV pushing editor, and a blatant case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT in the article. Any content not conforming to his edits, should be deleted. This is a gross example of WP:OWN. — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 08:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
|
I've fully protected the article from editing for one week. This isn't an endorsement of the current version, I just froze it in place the way I found it. Either work out a compromise here or at WP:DRN, or expect blocks if this keeps getting dragged to ANI, AN, WT:AN, etc. Don't bother addressing me, address each other and either work it out, or walk away. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 19:35, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
So become happy Mr. IndianBio bcoz now it's completely your article.
He was unhappy with my English so I wanna tell him that I did all my edit through my Windows phone.So I can't write like him bcoz typing with a cellphone is tiring.I write in parts on talk pages in short as its kills my fingers writing in details and formatting all links.If you think you are a good writer.....change the world Bio,write novels then....hehe....Indian ho Indian raho...( Pks1142 ( talk) 07:54, 20 November 2012 (UTC))
Please discuss before reverting to previous versions. The previous versions were not neutral,too large and had excessive details. The background section was directly copied from Chopra's article from her music career section.The contract details were talking about whole album and not this song in particular.The reviews which were added were either prediction or un neutral.Times of India,Hindustan times sources used for reviews were not reviews.Contract details should be included in album article.pls discuss further( Pks1142 ( talk) 06:26, 28 November 2012 (UTC))
We really need a reliable source for this claim. The one source is dead and the other one defining TP is confusing. Plenty of sources say 100,000 in a week, but no sources claim 600,000 total sales. BollyJeff | talk 02:51, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
(moved from
User talk:Iknow23)
Hello Iknow. Regarding
this edit, the reason it was hidden was the song "
Erase" is not a next single, that chronology is only for the officially released singles as I can infer from the template document. Hence kept it hidden until reliable third party sources come listing it as such. What do you say? —
Indian:BIO · [
ChitChat ]
07:04, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
OK. Not a 'single'. See [1] Beatport is a DJ source, not a public release.— Iknow23 ( talk) 02:54, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello guys, I think the time has come to prepare the article for GA. We'll have to be very critical about each and everything written in the article. IndianBio and I had worked for months on this article and now we are ready to take the challenge. Pks1142 ( talk) 03:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
It didn't even chart on the Billboard Hot 100! 01:37, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Huh — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.114.201.211 ( talk)
Text about the album per WP:COATRACK - doesn't belong here but maybe useful elsewhere:
By 2012, Chopra began traveling between India and Los Angeles to work extensively with Interscope to complete the album. She collaborated with artists such as Sam Watters, Matthew Koma, Jay Sean and producer RedOne. The album is currently in the final stages of mixing and production and is scheduled to release in December 2012. [1]
Text seems to be about the album cover artwork, though newzstreet.tv shows the single cover but talks about the album. Go figure!
On 10 September 2012, Chopra released the cover art for the single, through her Twitter account followed by the message, "For ur eyes only...my single cover! Say whaaaaa?" [2] The cover is described as a glamorous close-up of the artist, in her side-profile and having the color scheme of gold and black. A writer for the Hindustan Times felt that the cover art did justice to the genre of the music that Chopra was exploring, and portrayed the "glitz and glamor" associated with that of the image of a popstar. [2] The writer also complimented the choice of using a close-shot portrait for the cover art and felt it would tally with the current international production of Chopra's album. [2] Another writer for NBS News felt that Chopra looked like a diva on the cover and it was "indeed a pleasant departure to see the fashionista Priyanka back in the forefront again, especially after her new look for her upcoming film Barfi where she plays the character of an autistic girl and sports short curly hair." [3] The back cover of the album showed Chopra baring her legs in the image. [4] Art direction and design for the cover was done by Julian Peploe, while the photography was done by Stevie and Mada. [5]
She was the artist for Thursday Night Kickoff which began on 13 September with the 185th meeting between the Chicago Bears and the Green Bay Packers, the most-played rivalry in NFL history.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer:
Kailash29792 (
talk ·
contribs)
I will be reviewing this within the next 24 hours.
Kailash29792 (
talk)
13:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
These are the only comments I have. Once they have been resolved, the article can pass. Other minor issues have been taken care of by me. Kailash29792 ( talk) 08:54, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Congratulations Prashant! I'm also happy that I could finish this review in less than 24 hours. Kailash29792 ( talk) 12:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
References
rockstar
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).CD release
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on In My City. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:43, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
In My City article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | In My City has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
The article has been created since reliable third party sources like NME magazine has confirmed that the song has gone for commercial release in iTunes music stores. Hence commercial viability is a testament of it being a single. — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 09:22, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
For Them who are against the article ,I want to say that the single had charted,it even topped national charts like nokia(problem is iTunes is not available. In India). morever ,it had charted #89 to #80 and later to #71.go and check ITunes top 100 pop songs.Chopra is also shooting official music video browse you will get the news.following are links which shows that the song had charted
Even Chopra had posted on her twitter account which contains charts photos Link http://twitter.com/teampriyanka/status/253184317524697088&sa=U&ei=qYB1UMmjA4jsrAey4IEo&ved=0CCAQFjAC&usg=AFQjCNFilkL4ZUJzBU8E31ZkUTMBKA_mlA
So the policy is to delete the article when it does not meet notability criteria,GO AND OPEN KATY PERRY album article KATY HUDSON and on her article it is clearly written "HER ALBUM KATY HUDON FAILED TO CHART" still her article is not deleted and a single which has charted few positions can't have one( Pks1142 ( talk) 04:45, 11 October 2012 (UTC))
Alright, there are some potential problems with the contents being added by Pks1142. Continuously adding content not supported by sources does not lead to a verifiable article. Sources which are dubious like Digital Spy etc are not exactly reliable, also adding content which are WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NPOV violation and WP:WAX. So those should be removed. Share your thoughts. — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 12:28, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Material not supported by the sources claimed
Release history
1. India September 14, 2012 Digital download
Claimed source: Singh, Prashant (2012-09-08). "Priyanka Chopra to release debut song for Indian fans first". Hindustan Times (HT Media Ltd). Retrieved 2012-09-14.
Problems
Digital download is not mentioned in the article
Source states, "The release of the full song and accompanying video for "In My City" are expected later this year."
Source states, "Chopra will be the featured artist for Thursday Night Kickoff which begins Sept. 13" - This is not a 'release' but a 'licensing deal' to be used for a TV show. 'Release' means being available to purchase.
2. India September 14, 2012 CD single
Claimed source: Raghavendra, Nandini (2012-09-12). "Priyanka Chopra releases single 'In my City', trends to number one position on Twitter". The Economic Times (The Times Group). Retrieved 2012-10-11.
Problems
Article is dated Sept 13
CD single is not mentioned in the article.
"Universal Music releases the single tommorrow for sales in India while Nokia India will provide exclusive downloads and Blenders Pride has chosen the song to be a key feature in their upcoming multi city tours." - The Universal Music portion seems good at first, the others are more of a 'promotional use'. But even the Universal so-called here 'release' must just be a portion of the song as later statement shows "Although the full song and video for 'In My City' are expected to be ready later in the year...".
3. Restore an ACTUAL release source for US (iTunes). A REAL release source SHOWING DATE available for purchase (release date) is better than any other that just says it is being sold.
That last comment brings me to my MOST concern regarding releases in India. Since it now in the past, why can't there be ACTUAL DIRECT sources shown (with the dates available).—
Iknow23 (
talk)
12:59, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Just an FYI for anyone not knowing this, please don't add references to the lead section of the article, when the same info is reliably sourced in the article body, as per WP:LEAD. — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
The above user just removed a whole chunk of edits from the article, giving reasons as "not needed". Well simply "not needed because they are present in body/another article" is simply not a reason for removing content. Please see WP:WAX. The contents removed were all verifiable by third party reliable sources and present the basic flow and the chronology of the events taking place related to this song, which is released recently. As time goes and more information is available, the present info will also change. Pre-emptive action based on WP:CRYSTAL is not appreciated here. User:Pks1142, state your reasonings here and reach a WP:CONSENSUS. — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 11:41, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
I have reverted the addition of "Erase" as a next single, which was added by Pks1142. As per the link provided, no where it says that "Erase" is the next single from Chopra. Its just a song recorded with The Chainsmokers, and is being released to iTunes. Might be even promotional. This is a case of WP:CRYSTAL. — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:57, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Does mixed reviews mean 4 negative and 1 positive????? I don't know if he is criticizing the song or applauding it.It gets bad impression from reception which says only negative things for songs.Positive for chopra's vocals suits for Chopra article.Fake accent??? Well Does it is Indian song
Its an English made with American accent In mind.How editor knows its fake,well had she ever seen her speaking.What reviews has to to do Indian lyrics ,does it need to be included in English song.Is there any rule that every artist from respective country must use their native language.It doesn't make sense though.( Pks1142 ( talk) 08:04, 16 November 2012 (UTC))
We should include overall thought for the song Your recent edit which says Its success will be based on promotional campaigns doesn't make sense as A song becomes hit only depend on listener.its has bad impression .( Pks1142 ( talk) 08:39, 16 November 2012 (UTC))
Ok let's discuss.( Pks1142 ( talk) 10:50, 16 November 2012 (UTC))
Seeing that many pop artists use music and reality-based videos to create awareness around their upcoming releases, Chopra's team planned to create different promotional contents, like interviews of the artist, and behind-the-scenes footage with long-and-short documentaries, that would be released to the internet. The videos and interviews would focus on Chopra's journey in becoming a pop artist. Since most of the top ten hits in India are mainly songs from Bollywood films—where the actors lip-synch to the song—Chopra's label wanted to promote her as the first Bollywood actress who can also sing. According to Lee Hawkins from The Wall Street Journal, "If Chopra is able to convincingly establish herself as a respected singer, she will be a pioneer in South Asia. Throughout 2011, Anthony Saleh, one of Carter's partners at Atom Factory Inc., worked closely with Chopra for several weeks. Beyond selling music, the team planned to use Chopra's popularity and tap into ancillary revenue streams such as corporate sponsorships, high-fashion modeling, film and television, concert touring, and music publishing. Saleh added that they also "plan on developing [Chopra] as a songwriter
![]() | It seems like this RFC is discussing two seperate things without really being distinct about it. One issue is if promotion in general is a subject that should be covered in song articles and the other is whether it should be in this article in particular. However, as a matter of what slim consensus there is here and a simpler matter of Wikipedia policy the answer is the same for both: Did the promotional efforts related to the song receive significant coverage from
reliable sources to the extent that covering it in the article will not lend it
undue weight? This is something that needs to be decided on a case by case basis, and in this case it appears there is a (weak) consensus that the promotional efforts made on this songs' behalf were sufficiently notable to be mentioned in the article.
|
Are promotional campaigns and strategies by labels irrelevant/not needed for a song article? — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 12:37, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Does it make sense that these are promotion.Clearly its all about who is planning,who thought what,what her team thought.My view is that it should be started directly as promotions started from this or that place.( Pks1142 ( talk) 13:57, 16 November 2012 (UTC))
Also someone's prediction that she will be a pioneer does it talk about promotion....huh...pls understand,we don't need to include someone's thought and PR skills.where are documentaries????only 1 behind the scenes video???? Is it new no....every next star releases these stuffs which are not nee.( Pks1142 ( talk) 04:45, 17 November 2012 (UTC))
Extended content
|
---|
Another 2K of content was again blatantly removed by User:Pks1142, without discussing in the talk page, when he has been asked so many times to do so. A closer look at the edit summaries makes me realise that this is a serious POV pushing editor, and a blatant case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT in the article. Any content not conforming to his edits, should be deleted. This is a gross example of WP:OWN. — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 08:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
|
I've fully protected the article from editing for one week. This isn't an endorsement of the current version, I just froze it in place the way I found it. Either work out a compromise here or at WP:DRN, or expect blocks if this keeps getting dragged to ANI, AN, WT:AN, etc. Don't bother addressing me, address each other and either work it out, or walk away. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 19:35, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
So become happy Mr. IndianBio bcoz now it's completely your article.
He was unhappy with my English so I wanna tell him that I did all my edit through my Windows phone.So I can't write like him bcoz typing with a cellphone is tiring.I write in parts on talk pages in short as its kills my fingers writing in details and formatting all links.If you think you are a good writer.....change the world Bio,write novels then....hehe....Indian ho Indian raho...( Pks1142 ( talk) 07:54, 20 November 2012 (UTC))
Please discuss before reverting to previous versions. The previous versions were not neutral,too large and had excessive details. The background section was directly copied from Chopra's article from her music career section.The contract details were talking about whole album and not this song in particular.The reviews which were added were either prediction or un neutral.Times of India,Hindustan times sources used for reviews were not reviews.Contract details should be included in album article.pls discuss further( Pks1142 ( talk) 06:26, 28 November 2012 (UTC))
We really need a reliable source for this claim. The one source is dead and the other one defining TP is confusing. Plenty of sources say 100,000 in a week, but no sources claim 600,000 total sales. BollyJeff | talk 02:51, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
(moved from
User talk:Iknow23)
Hello Iknow. Regarding
this edit, the reason it was hidden was the song "
Erase" is not a next single, that chronology is only for the officially released singles as I can infer from the template document. Hence kept it hidden until reliable third party sources come listing it as such. What do you say? —
Indian:BIO · [
ChitChat ]
07:04, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
OK. Not a 'single'. See [1] Beatport is a DJ source, not a public release.— Iknow23 ( talk) 02:54, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello guys, I think the time has come to prepare the article for GA. We'll have to be very critical about each and everything written in the article. IndianBio and I had worked for months on this article and now we are ready to take the challenge. Pks1142 ( talk) 03:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
It didn't even chart on the Billboard Hot 100! 01:37, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Huh — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.114.201.211 ( talk)
Text about the album per WP:COATRACK - doesn't belong here but maybe useful elsewhere:
By 2012, Chopra began traveling between India and Los Angeles to work extensively with Interscope to complete the album. She collaborated with artists such as Sam Watters, Matthew Koma, Jay Sean and producer RedOne. The album is currently in the final stages of mixing and production and is scheduled to release in December 2012. [1]
Text seems to be about the album cover artwork, though newzstreet.tv shows the single cover but talks about the album. Go figure!
On 10 September 2012, Chopra released the cover art for the single, through her Twitter account followed by the message, "For ur eyes only...my single cover! Say whaaaaa?" [2] The cover is described as a glamorous close-up of the artist, in her side-profile and having the color scheme of gold and black. A writer for the Hindustan Times felt that the cover art did justice to the genre of the music that Chopra was exploring, and portrayed the "glitz and glamor" associated with that of the image of a popstar. [2] The writer also complimented the choice of using a close-shot portrait for the cover art and felt it would tally with the current international production of Chopra's album. [2] Another writer for NBS News felt that Chopra looked like a diva on the cover and it was "indeed a pleasant departure to see the fashionista Priyanka back in the forefront again, especially after her new look for her upcoming film Barfi where she plays the character of an autistic girl and sports short curly hair." [3] The back cover of the album showed Chopra baring her legs in the image. [4] Art direction and design for the cover was done by Julian Peploe, while the photography was done by Stevie and Mada. [5]
She was the artist for Thursday Night Kickoff which began on 13 September with the 185th meeting between the Chicago Bears and the Green Bay Packers, the most-played rivalry in NFL history.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer:
Kailash29792 (
talk ·
contribs)
I will be reviewing this within the next 24 hours.
Kailash29792 (
talk)
13:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
These are the only comments I have. Once they have been resolved, the article can pass. Other minor issues have been taken care of by me. Kailash29792 ( talk) 08:54, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Congratulations Prashant! I'm also happy that I could finish this review in less than 24 hours. Kailash29792 ( talk) 12:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
References
rockstar
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).CD release
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on In My City. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:43, 12 November 2017 (UTC)