This article was nominated for deletion on 16 May 2011. The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chess Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is adding notes to the moves 'original research' or simply 'providing context'? Because I think it might help to add more notes to the game score because it will help people better understand what is happening. -- I 14:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC) reply

I believe it should be OK. -- Fred- Jn 22:42, 8 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I cannot find any reliable source of this game being called the "Immortal losing game". I can only find it on the chess site http://www.onlychess.com/main.php?page=immortal_losinggame and it seems to have been copied directly from Wikipedia.

Also, you cannot use the entry from Answers.com as a reference, because it is a Wikipedia mirror. Fred- Jn 22:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Not great but something as it's in the title ChessCreator ( talk) 16:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Not great at all, as the "titles" on that site tend to be puns made up by the administrators. 70.22.235.193 ( talk) 04:30, 24 August 2008 (UTC) reply