This article was nominated for deletion on 11 August 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
When I was formatting the references, I noticed that the Nairapen source looked questionable to me. In the same edit, I saw a flag for predatory journals. Can anyone confirm which source it was? Darkfrog24 ( talk) 01:21, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
If we can post at least once source that isn't paywalled, this article will be less likely to be deleted. The people considering it for deletion will see for themselves that it is sourced. Darkfrog24 ( talk) 21:00, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Ddddemonstrate: I had to revert this article as the references don't prove the battle even exists. The references that are there are woeful. The point to some volume which I checked and its about three short paragraphs which are insufficient to pass WP:GNG. It will need more than that. References to exhibitions and book citation profiles fail WP:V. It is in-depth coverage. scope_creep Talk 12:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 11 August 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
When I was formatting the references, I noticed that the Nairapen source looked questionable to me. In the same edit, I saw a flag for predatory journals. Can anyone confirm which source it was? Darkfrog24 ( talk) 01:21, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
If we can post at least once source that isn't paywalled, this article will be less likely to be deleted. The people considering it for deletion will see for themselves that it is sourced. Darkfrog24 ( talk) 21:00, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Ddddemonstrate: I had to revert this article as the references don't prove the battle even exists. The references that are there are woeful. The point to some volume which I checked and its about three short paragraphs which are insufficient to pass WP:GNG. It will need more than that. References to exhibitions and book citation profiles fail WP:V. It is in-depth coverage. scope_creep Talk 12:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC)