![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Idealism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:35, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Given that both assert the existence of spirits (including, in most formulations, that of God), Atheists often incorrectly describe Idealism as a form of Mind-Body Dualism. I have seen this happen in many debates (YouTube comments, Facebook threads, etc.), but if anyone can help me find an actual source rather than just an anecdote that such a mistake is typically made by many Atheists, that would be much appreciated. The Mysterious El Willstro ( talk) 03:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
> "Given that both assert..." Both what? What two things are doing the asserting? Gwideman ( talk) 03:50, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Idealism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Idealists either a. they don't analyze consciousness, either b. they analyze it using terms they don't analyze metalogically, either c. they analyze consciousness to many constituents but don't define exactly what the noun fundamentality means.
The article on objective idealism is currently less informative than the subsection here. If someone has the time and expertise, they may want to update the article or merge it here. Brittletheories ( talk) 20:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Worst argument has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 7 § Worst argument until a consensus is reached.
Duckmather (
talk) 19:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Idealism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:35, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Given that both assert the existence of spirits (including, in most formulations, that of God), Atheists often incorrectly describe Idealism as a form of Mind-Body Dualism. I have seen this happen in many debates (YouTube comments, Facebook threads, etc.), but if anyone can help me find an actual source rather than just an anecdote that such a mistake is typically made by many Atheists, that would be much appreciated. The Mysterious El Willstro ( talk) 03:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
> "Given that both assert..." Both what? What two things are doing the asserting? Gwideman ( talk) 03:50, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Idealism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Idealists either a. they don't analyze consciousness, either b. they analyze it using terms they don't analyze metalogically, either c. they analyze consciousness to many constituents but don't define exactly what the noun fundamentality means.
The article on objective idealism is currently less informative than the subsection here. If someone has the time and expertise, they may want to update the article or merge it here. Brittletheories ( talk) 20:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Worst argument has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 7 § Worst argument until a consensus is reached.
Duckmather (
talk) 19:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)