This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ibn al-Athir article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Last time you deleted my EB citation i replied with
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_281#Britannica.com stating that it is totally reliable source
User:HistoryOfIran replied:
“the most recent being
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_115#Is_Encyclopedia_Britannica_a_reliable_source?), yet you conveniently took the one that supported your revert the most.”
This is definitely not the most recent one it’s from 2012, Even the summary of the discussion you sent doesn’t even say that EB is unreliable source
The discussion
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_281#Britannica.com
Which is more recent (from 2019) says that it’s a totally reliable source
So what is your point from removing it’s citation ? It’s looks like that you remove it’s citation from everywhere on your own based on the claim you made up that EB not being RS
Ikhnatoun (
talk) 18:38, 28 December 2022 (UTC) <---
blocked
sock of
User:Amr.elmowaled
“ Where do you get the impression that the participants reached to the conclusion that it is reliable?”
From the author who summarized the discussion he wrote:
I believe noone will object if I summarise the dispute as follows: whereas the EB articles authored by reputable scientists or scholars can be used as a source for Wikipedia in the absence of better sources, it would be desirable to replace them with references to reliable secondary sources when such possibility exists.--Paul Siebert
———————-
So where did you get that EB is not RS ? He never said that
Nevertheless, the most recent one states that EB is totally relible:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_281#Britannica.com
So i wonder where does your point stand ?
Ikhnatoun (
talk) 19:23, 28 December 2022 (UTC) <---
blocked
sock of
User:Amr.elmowaled
I think it’s clear that the majority here
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_281#Britannica.com agree on EB reliability, perhaps only two or three users just stated that EB sometimes contain some errors, that’s all,
—-have you by any chance made another account before?
Yes i had one few years ago but i forgot it’s username and password since they were long ago Lol
Ikhnatoun (
talk) 20:04, 28 December 2022 (UTC) <---
blocked
sock of
User:Amr.elmowaled
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ibn al-Athir article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Last time you deleted my EB citation i replied with
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_281#Britannica.com stating that it is totally reliable source
User:HistoryOfIran replied:
“the most recent being
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_115#Is_Encyclopedia_Britannica_a_reliable_source?), yet you conveniently took the one that supported your revert the most.”
This is definitely not the most recent one it’s from 2012, Even the summary of the discussion you sent doesn’t even say that EB is unreliable source
The discussion
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_281#Britannica.com
Which is more recent (from 2019) says that it’s a totally reliable source
So what is your point from removing it’s citation ? It’s looks like that you remove it’s citation from everywhere on your own based on the claim you made up that EB not being RS
Ikhnatoun (
talk) 18:38, 28 December 2022 (UTC) <---
blocked
sock of
User:Amr.elmowaled
“ Where do you get the impression that the participants reached to the conclusion that it is reliable?”
From the author who summarized the discussion he wrote:
I believe noone will object if I summarise the dispute as follows: whereas the EB articles authored by reputable scientists or scholars can be used as a source for Wikipedia in the absence of better sources, it would be desirable to replace them with references to reliable secondary sources when such possibility exists.--Paul Siebert
———————-
So where did you get that EB is not RS ? He never said that
Nevertheless, the most recent one states that EB is totally relible:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_281#Britannica.com
So i wonder where does your point stand ?
Ikhnatoun (
talk) 19:23, 28 December 2022 (UTC) <---
blocked
sock of
User:Amr.elmowaled
I think it’s clear that the majority here
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_281#Britannica.com agree on EB reliability, perhaps only two or three users just stated that EB sometimes contain some errors, that’s all,
—-have you by any chance made another account before?
Yes i had one few years ago but i forgot it’s username and password since they were long ago Lol
Ikhnatoun (
talk) 20:04, 28 December 2022 (UTC) <---
blocked
sock of
User:Amr.elmowaled