This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think this page be merged into January. There is no need for a separate article on the latin name of a month, when such information already exists in the month's article. Nyh 10:55, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Now that we have a full list of Roman dates for the month, it can't really fit into the #History section of January any more. That said, this month's COMMON ENGLISH NAME is still "January" and it's exactly the same month, just focused on its Roman context. It should be moved to January (Roman) or January (Roman calendar) instead of pretending that the Latin name was talking about a different subject or that it is commonly used in English. — LlywelynII 02:03, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
The alt form with J, the common anglicized form, and the abbreviation need to show up bolded in the article. If there's a feeling that they clutter the lead, they should be moved with the etymology to a new #Name section rather than removed entirely. — LlywelynII 23:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think this page be merged into January. There is no need for a separate article on the latin name of a month, when such information already exists in the month's article. Nyh 10:55, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Now that we have a full list of Roman dates for the month, it can't really fit into the #History section of January any more. That said, this month's COMMON ENGLISH NAME is still "January" and it's exactly the same month, just focused on its Roman context. It should be moved to January (Roman) or January (Roman calendar) instead of pretending that the Latin name was talking about a different subject or that it is commonly used in English. — LlywelynII 02:03, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
The alt form with J, the common anglicized form, and the abbreviation need to show up bolded in the article. If there's a feeling that they clutter the lead, they should be moved with the etymology to a new #Name section rather than removed entirely. — LlywelynII 23:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)