This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
References to use. Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 15:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
I don't think that the inclusion of Chaos theory in the See also section of this article is appropriate. Although Chaos theory is related to other See also entries, such as Irreducible complexity - Eye, it is not directly related to this article. I would like to eliminate the entry. The impression I have reading the See also list, is that the contributors had an agenda against or for creationism, which should not be the scope of this article.-- Gciriani ( talk) 21:29, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
In § Plot:
Impossible to tell whether studies or results is meant. -- Thnidu ( talk) 07:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC) Thnidu ( talk) 07:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Is it really a science fiction film? It was fiction about science, but it did not meet the classical definition of science fiction. It was about, a philosophical concept. -- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk) 07:02, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
References to use. Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 15:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
I don't think that the inclusion of Chaos theory in the See also section of this article is appropriate. Although Chaos theory is related to other See also entries, such as Irreducible complexity - Eye, it is not directly related to this article. I would like to eliminate the entry. The impression I have reading the See also list, is that the contributors had an agenda against or for creationism, which should not be the scope of this article.-- Gciriani ( talk) 21:29, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
In § Plot:
Impossible to tell whether studies or results is meant. -- Thnidu ( talk) 07:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC) Thnidu ( talk) 07:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Is it really a science fiction film? It was fiction about science, but it did not meet the classical definition of science fiction. It was about, a philosophical concept. -- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk) 07:02, 23 December 2014 (UTC)