This is the
talk page of a
redirect that has been
merged and now targets the page: • Interstate 95 Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Interstate 95 Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
What is the difference between this new template and the traditional AFD template?? Georgia guy 19:11, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Namely that I just defeated the proposal for deletion (or will, after I post this, by removing the prod template) by my disagreement with deletion. An exit list for I-95 is relevant, is encouraged by WP:IH, but does not belong in the main article due to the length of the interstate (also per WP:IH). I'll also be bringing this list up at the I-95 talk page. -- C.Fred 04:59, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
This is the author writing again. If you have the time, check out my lists for I-90, I-5, and I-10 at I-90 exit list, I-5 exit list and I-10 Exit List. Feel free to comment and add things. Also, I was partially inspired for this article by the article for I-285, the Atlanta beltway, which has a great exit list complete with decals for Interstate and state routes. I don't know a thing about decals, so I would encourage editors with knowledge to go right ahead and add them if they can.
Pending the outcome on the I-95 talk page, should we begin organising the exits in a table by state? MPD01605 08:07, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm the author. I was a bit concerned when you mentioned deletion, because I must confess I've gotten my information for this solely from other online exit lists. Is that all right? If so, does anybody know where I can find lists for North Carolina and Florida? Editors can feel free to add at will. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Andyjay729 ( talk • contribs) 17:40, 25 February 2006 (UTC).
Okay, I did three new tables, VA, MD, and DE. I have to go but I'll work on some more later. I also flipped the states so that Florida is at the top, and Maine is at the bottom. The exits aren't flipped yet, I do that as I make the table. I actually enjoy doing this. I like this table because it's simple and straight to the point, and if they want a more comprehensive analysis of each interchange, they can visit the individual state articles, to which I will insert links as soon as I'm done. All that we need are exit lists for NC and FL, and we'll be set. Unless you see an error, let's not do anything major until we have exits done, eh? -- MPD01605 17:41, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
I don't want to rain on anybody's parade, but before we start tabling and formatting everything, we have to flip the entire list upside-down. I'm not going to start anything, as this is a pretty big project and I think we need to know what has to be done, and have it all planned out. MPD01605 01:21, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Please stop converting this page to a redirect. I've done work on exit lists too. It is salvagable. -- Rschen7754 ( talk - contribs) 04:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
There already exist more accurate exit lists on several articles such as Interstate 95 in New Jersey, and thus the page was edited to link to those to avoid a content fork. Several editors are reverting this for no apparent reason. -- SPUI ( talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 07:44, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
--Looking at both pages it is easy to tell that the New Jersey 95 list is more comprehensive, and I believe this should be deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mickey.herman ( talk • contribs) 14:14, 10 March 2006 (UTC).
SPUI: How about this. Leave Virginia in this article, and NJ, NY and CT can all redirect, and then we'll finish Mass and Maine. Deal? -- MPD01605 19:17, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-03-12 U.S. Roads has been opened. -- Rschen7754 ( talk - contribs) 05:44, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
The WikiProject states that there is consensus to split the main Interstate 95 article into individual articles for the states. Thus I would think that there would be the same consensus to split the exit list and merge it with the individual state articles. I agree with SPUI on this one, although I don't necessarily agree with the way he's going about it. -- Northenglish 21:25, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Why not transclude the tables as is being done with elections? Rich Farmbrough 20:14 13 March 2006 (UTC).
I like it and the idea. I'd like to call for a consensus on the matter. We create individual articles for the exit lists, and transclude them here and in the appropriate "I-95 in XX" page. --~~
I had always been told that content should not be transcluded in this way, but personally I see no problem with this. I might play around with the placement of the edit link. -- SPUI ( talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 03:50, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
So, does someone want to transclude NJ, NY, CT, and ME? -- MPD01605 04:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
This is the
talk page of a
redirect that has been
merged and now targets the page: • Interstate 95 Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Interstate 95 Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
What is the difference between this new template and the traditional AFD template?? Georgia guy 19:11, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Namely that I just defeated the proposal for deletion (or will, after I post this, by removing the prod template) by my disagreement with deletion. An exit list for I-95 is relevant, is encouraged by WP:IH, but does not belong in the main article due to the length of the interstate (also per WP:IH). I'll also be bringing this list up at the I-95 talk page. -- C.Fred 04:59, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
This is the author writing again. If you have the time, check out my lists for I-90, I-5, and I-10 at I-90 exit list, I-5 exit list and I-10 Exit List. Feel free to comment and add things. Also, I was partially inspired for this article by the article for I-285, the Atlanta beltway, which has a great exit list complete with decals for Interstate and state routes. I don't know a thing about decals, so I would encourage editors with knowledge to go right ahead and add them if they can.
Pending the outcome on the I-95 talk page, should we begin organising the exits in a table by state? MPD01605 08:07, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm the author. I was a bit concerned when you mentioned deletion, because I must confess I've gotten my information for this solely from other online exit lists. Is that all right? If so, does anybody know where I can find lists for North Carolina and Florida? Editors can feel free to add at will. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Andyjay729 ( talk • contribs) 17:40, 25 February 2006 (UTC).
Okay, I did three new tables, VA, MD, and DE. I have to go but I'll work on some more later. I also flipped the states so that Florida is at the top, and Maine is at the bottom. The exits aren't flipped yet, I do that as I make the table. I actually enjoy doing this. I like this table because it's simple and straight to the point, and if they want a more comprehensive analysis of each interchange, they can visit the individual state articles, to which I will insert links as soon as I'm done. All that we need are exit lists for NC and FL, and we'll be set. Unless you see an error, let's not do anything major until we have exits done, eh? -- MPD01605 17:41, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
I don't want to rain on anybody's parade, but before we start tabling and formatting everything, we have to flip the entire list upside-down. I'm not going to start anything, as this is a pretty big project and I think we need to know what has to be done, and have it all planned out. MPD01605 01:21, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Please stop converting this page to a redirect. I've done work on exit lists too. It is salvagable. -- Rschen7754 ( talk - contribs) 04:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
There already exist more accurate exit lists on several articles such as Interstate 95 in New Jersey, and thus the page was edited to link to those to avoid a content fork. Several editors are reverting this for no apparent reason. -- SPUI ( talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 07:44, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
--Looking at both pages it is easy to tell that the New Jersey 95 list is more comprehensive, and I believe this should be deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mickey.herman ( talk • contribs) 14:14, 10 March 2006 (UTC).
SPUI: How about this. Leave Virginia in this article, and NJ, NY and CT can all redirect, and then we'll finish Mass and Maine. Deal? -- MPD01605 19:17, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-03-12 U.S. Roads has been opened. -- Rschen7754 ( talk - contribs) 05:44, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
The WikiProject states that there is consensus to split the main Interstate 95 article into individual articles for the states. Thus I would think that there would be the same consensus to split the exit list and merge it with the individual state articles. I agree with SPUI on this one, although I don't necessarily agree with the way he's going about it. -- Northenglish 21:25, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Why not transclude the tables as is being done with elections? Rich Farmbrough 20:14 13 March 2006 (UTC).
I like it and the idea. I'd like to call for a consensus on the matter. We create individual articles for the exit lists, and transclude them here and in the appropriate "I-95 in XX" page. --~~
I had always been told that content should not be transcluded in this way, but personally I see no problem with this. I might play around with the placement of the edit link. -- SPUI ( talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 03:50, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
So, does someone want to transclude NJ, NY, CT, and ME? -- MPD01605 04:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)