This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Please discuss below: -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 13:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Countries such as China and Russia are mentioned. But on several other occasions phrases are used such as “the navy” or “the army”, presumably referring to the ones in the United States (but not clearly stated). The reader is therefore needed to take the perspective of the United States. This is not a neutral way of speaking about nations. Especially not when it comes to ware fare as in the part of missiles. Kyrkovaktmästarn' ( talk) 04:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Should there be a separate article on hypersonic weapons (or work toward them)? Gah4 ( talk) 05:28, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
In the text describing the Chinese missle test, it said, "...missing its target by only two dozen miles." The word "only" implies that it was a slight miss, which it was not. There are no reliable sources that say that a weapon system missing a target by two dozen miles is a slight miss. I'm removing the word "only" (again). Sparkie82 ( t• c) 20:26, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
The article mentions all existing nuclear missile defense systems, but doesn't say what they are. Are there WP articles about any of them? Gah4 ( talk) 20:16, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
I propose that the portions of this page about hypersonic weapons be split out and merged into the page called Hypersonic weapon. The content of the section is large and well-sourced enough to make its own page. Hosortyr ( talk) 13:58, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
I am waiting for the announcement of the reason for the loss of telemetry data in ARRW (13 Mar 2023). [1] Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 03:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
References
Supposedly the check for B-status concluded citations were provided, yet in the first paragraph there is a claim about Mach25+ ("Speeds of Mach 25+ have been achieved below the thermosphere as of 2020.") and that has no citation at this point in the article nor can I find any Mach 25 flight through google or in the citations in the article. This kind of claim needs to have a source listed. (Sorry if my method of communication is not sufficient... I just wanted to alert you to a problem with this page and I don't know how that was not caught in the B-status review... that's also troubling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.115.207.207 ( talk) 17:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Please discuss below: -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 13:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Countries such as China and Russia are mentioned. But on several other occasions phrases are used such as “the navy” or “the army”, presumably referring to the ones in the United States (but not clearly stated). The reader is therefore needed to take the perspective of the United States. This is not a neutral way of speaking about nations. Especially not when it comes to ware fare as in the part of missiles. Kyrkovaktmästarn' ( talk) 04:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Should there be a separate article on hypersonic weapons (or work toward them)? Gah4 ( talk) 05:28, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
In the text describing the Chinese missle test, it said, "...missing its target by only two dozen miles." The word "only" implies that it was a slight miss, which it was not. There are no reliable sources that say that a weapon system missing a target by two dozen miles is a slight miss. I'm removing the word "only" (again). Sparkie82 ( t• c) 20:26, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
The article mentions all existing nuclear missile defense systems, but doesn't say what they are. Are there WP articles about any of them? Gah4 ( talk) 20:16, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
I propose that the portions of this page about hypersonic weapons be split out and merged into the page called Hypersonic weapon. The content of the section is large and well-sourced enough to make its own page. Hosortyr ( talk) 13:58, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
I am waiting for the announcement of the reason for the loss of telemetry data in ARRW (13 Mar 2023). [1] Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 03:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
References
Supposedly the check for B-status concluded citations were provided, yet in the first paragraph there is a claim about Mach25+ ("Speeds of Mach 25+ have been achieved below the thermosphere as of 2020.") and that has no citation at this point in the article nor can I find any Mach 25 flight through google or in the citations in the article. This kind of claim needs to have a source listed. (Sorry if my method of communication is not sufficient... I just wanted to alert you to a problem with this page and I don't know how that was not caught in the B-status review... that's also troubling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.115.207.207 ( talk) 17:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)