 | Hurricane Kristy (2006) was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Delisted good article | ||||||||||||||||
Basically a storm that caused no impacts, and nothing special about MH. Not really notable. -- 219.79.181.34 ( talk) 02:32, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A nothingburger of a storm. Did nothing except kill some fish. Don't tell me that GAs and well-developed articles cannot be merged, because they can. ~ Destroyeraa 🌀 14:42, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. SMB9 9thx my edits 11:12, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- Merge Wow, the impact only fits in one sentence. I think the season article can fit this storm in it. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 13:23, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- Merge No need for this article Cyclonetracker ( talk) 20:33, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment See WT:WPTC#Merge discussions getting out of hand: moratorium proposal. I think we should step away from merges for 3-5 months, and focus on creating. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 12:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
strongWeak oppose it's a GA. see also [1]. I get if others want to merge it but we need to focus on article creation. -- HurricaneTracker495 School Chromebook ( talk) 18:33, 18 November 2020 (UTC)- Support as author. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 18:45, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- The season section is well developed. The time to merge this was when the 2006 PHS list of storm page was merged, and IIRC Hink didn't push for a merger then, so not sure why he is here. Y E Pacific Hurricane 19:06, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- I was more focused on merging Aletta, Bud, Carlotta, Fabio, Hector, and Ileana, those low-hanging fruit. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- Right, and I recall you defending both Kristy and Sergio in favor of much of the aforementioned batch. Y E Pacific Hurricane 19:23, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- Which weren't as quite low-hanging fruit as the others. Now, Kristy and Sergio stand out, especially since so many sections in the season article are on the short side (shorter than what would be expected nowadays). ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:28, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- Can we just focus on the reasoning in the arguments rather than who defended what? - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 19:27, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- Merge - The storm had no meaningful impacts, broke no records, and is essentially a fish storm. This article fails WP:N per WP:ONESOURCE (National Hurricane Center) and WP:DIVERSE for lack of coverage through third party sourcing. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 21:30, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- Merge I agree with Destroyeraa. ChessEric ( talk · contribs) 15:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
I merged the article given the consensus here, getting it in before the merge moratorium starts. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 16:47, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
|
| Hurricane Kristy (2006) was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Delisted good article | ||||||||||||||||
Basically a storm that caused no impacts, and nothing special about MH. Not really notable. -- 219.79.181.34 ( talk) 02:32, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A nothingburger of a storm. Did nothing except kill some fish. Don't tell me that GAs and well-developed articles cannot be merged, because they can. ~ Destroyeraa 🌀 14:42, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. SMB9 9thx my edits 11:12, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- Merge Wow, the impact only fits in one sentence. I think the season article can fit this storm in it. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 13:23, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- Merge No need for this article Cyclonetracker ( talk) 20:33, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment See WT:WPTC#Merge discussions getting out of hand: moratorium proposal. I think we should step away from merges for 3-5 months, and focus on creating. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 12:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
strongWeak oppose it's a GA. see also [1]. I get if others want to merge it but we need to focus on article creation. -- HurricaneTracker495 School Chromebook ( talk) 18:33, 18 November 2020 (UTC)- Support as author. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 18:45, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- The season section is well developed. The time to merge this was when the 2006 PHS list of storm page was merged, and IIRC Hink didn't push for a merger then, so not sure why he is here. Y E Pacific Hurricane 19:06, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- I was more focused on merging Aletta, Bud, Carlotta, Fabio, Hector, and Ileana, those low-hanging fruit. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- Right, and I recall you defending both Kristy and Sergio in favor of much of the aforementioned batch. Y E Pacific Hurricane 19:23, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- Which weren't as quite low-hanging fruit as the others. Now, Kristy and Sergio stand out, especially since so many sections in the season article are on the short side (shorter than what would be expected nowadays). ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:28, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- Can we just focus on the reasoning in the arguments rather than who defended what? - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 19:27, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- Merge - The storm had no meaningful impacts, broke no records, and is essentially a fish storm. This article fails WP:N per WP:ONESOURCE (National Hurricane Center) and WP:DIVERSE for lack of coverage through third party sourcing. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 21:30, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- Merge I agree with Destroyeraa. ChessEric ( talk · contribs) 15:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
I merged the article given the consensus here, getting it in before the merge moratorium starts. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 16:47, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.