![]() | Hurricane John (1994) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | Hurricane John (1994) is part of the Category 5 Pacific hurricanes series, a featured topic. It is also part of the 1994 Pacific hurricane season series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 11, 2014. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
NOAA says this is in fact the case [1]. They make no mention of Pancho. The disturbance stages are included in that storm's best track, which may be why there is a discrepancy. -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde - archive 01:35, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
What is Pancho?
ThatDudeThatLovesRollerCoasters ( talk) 18:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Some kind of stucture...maybe a separate "records" section, I dunno. Jdorje 02:42, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
The most interesting part is the ACE of this storm. It was a long lived cat 5 hurricane. Maybe the hurricane with highest ACE. juan andrés 21:06, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
See Talk:Accumulated Cyclone Energy#Historical_ACE_data and talk:Accumulated_Cyclone_Energy/EPac_by_ACE. — jdorje ( talk) 08:49, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
That proves me I'm wrong. Typhoon John had the 3rd biggest ACE overall. But the biggest East Pacific ACE. Thank you, really I was curious for the info. juan andrés 01:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Call me a bit biased, but I'm upping this one to A class since it's under consideration for a FAC. — C uivi é nen T| C| @ on Thursday, 1 June 2006 at 20:13 UTC
There is a variable with Ophelia's record: the disturbance stage is included in the best track. I don't know if that would reduce the distance it is estimated to have traveled because I don't know if the disturbance stage was included in the measurement but it could be an X-factor with regards to that record. -- § Hurricane E RIC § archive 23:46, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
WPac storm history is really lacking. Not a single use of the JTWC ATCR - it's important because the JTWC failed miserably operationally with John (see 1994 Pacific typhoon season#Typhoon John) – Ch acor 14:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
@ Cyclonebiskit: @ Supportstorm: @ Yellow Evan: @ Hurricanehink: @ Jason Rees: @ Typhoon2013: @ Jasper Deng: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/storm_wallets/epacific/ep1994/john/public/tcp2309z.gif
I know that this is operational data, but should we take it into account? ABC paulista ( talk) 21:47, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
I think those pressures were rough estimates given operationally. Not really analyzed thoroughly enough to be included in HURDAT since they all appear to be in 10 millibar increments.
Supportstorm (
talk)
18:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Hurricane John (1994). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:29, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( non-admin closure) TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:54, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Hurricane John (1994) → Hurricane John – Very prominent John since it's one of the longest living tropical cyclones worldwide. And, even the 2006 page is much more larger in bytes, i'm pretty sure that this John IS a primary topic. -- SMB99thx XD ( contribs) 10:28, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
@ MarioProtIV: In this kind of Infobox, it is only meant to show the winds when the system attained its peak intensity, and in John's case, its peak intensity was under CPHC's area of responsability, not JMA's one. Also, it would be confusing for the reader to understand that both 1-min and 10-min are reflective to different basins and different since we also apply unnofficial JTWC winds to non-NWS agencies' areas of resopnsabilities. That's why in all mutiple-basin storms, we only add the peak intensity of them, regadless the basin where it achieved it. So infoboxes about storms like Gay, Paka, Oliwa, Dora, Leon–Eline and others don't include winds and pressure of the other basins that they travelled. ABC paulista ( talk) 16:08, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Hurricane John (1994). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:16, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
I am reviewing this 2006 FA as part of the FA sweeps to determine of older FAs still meet WP:WIAFA.
I did not uncover any indications of too close paraphrasing or copyvio or copying within Wikipedia without attribution. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 04:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
I noticed that the distance travelled provided in this text is inaccurate. Does anyone have the original track data that can directly indicate the travel distance?
Besides, does the track of extratropical cyclone count in travel distance? Clearly, we didn't count the lifetime of extratropical form of a cyclone when saying "Hurricane John has a lifetime of 31 days". Ustczyh9 ( talk) 18:46, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
The WMO has announced that it will be looking into whether Freddy has broken the record for the longest-lasting TC. As such, I advise that the lede not be updated till the WMO releases its report. Java Hurricane 13:18, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Hurricane John (1994) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | Hurricane John (1994) is part of the Category 5 Pacific hurricanes series, a featured topic. It is also part of the 1994 Pacific hurricane season series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 11, 2014. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
NOAA says this is in fact the case [1]. They make no mention of Pancho. The disturbance stages are included in that storm's best track, which may be why there is a discrepancy. -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde - archive 01:35, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
What is Pancho?
ThatDudeThatLovesRollerCoasters ( talk) 18:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Some kind of stucture...maybe a separate "records" section, I dunno. Jdorje 02:42, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
The most interesting part is the ACE of this storm. It was a long lived cat 5 hurricane. Maybe the hurricane with highest ACE. juan andrés 21:06, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
See Talk:Accumulated Cyclone Energy#Historical_ACE_data and talk:Accumulated_Cyclone_Energy/EPac_by_ACE. — jdorje ( talk) 08:49, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
That proves me I'm wrong. Typhoon John had the 3rd biggest ACE overall. But the biggest East Pacific ACE. Thank you, really I was curious for the info. juan andrés 01:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Call me a bit biased, but I'm upping this one to A class since it's under consideration for a FAC. — C uivi é nen T| C| @ on Thursday, 1 June 2006 at 20:13 UTC
There is a variable with Ophelia's record: the disturbance stage is included in the best track. I don't know if that would reduce the distance it is estimated to have traveled because I don't know if the disturbance stage was included in the measurement but it could be an X-factor with regards to that record. -- § Hurricane E RIC § archive 23:46, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
WPac storm history is really lacking. Not a single use of the JTWC ATCR - it's important because the JTWC failed miserably operationally with John (see 1994 Pacific typhoon season#Typhoon John) – Ch acor 14:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
@ Cyclonebiskit: @ Supportstorm: @ Yellow Evan: @ Hurricanehink: @ Jason Rees: @ Typhoon2013: @ Jasper Deng: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/storm_wallets/epacific/ep1994/john/public/tcp2309z.gif
I know that this is operational data, but should we take it into account? ABC paulista ( talk) 21:47, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
I think those pressures were rough estimates given operationally. Not really analyzed thoroughly enough to be included in HURDAT since they all appear to be in 10 millibar increments.
Supportstorm (
talk)
18:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Hurricane John (1994). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:29, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( non-admin closure) TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:54, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Hurricane John (1994) → Hurricane John – Very prominent John since it's one of the longest living tropical cyclones worldwide. And, even the 2006 page is much more larger in bytes, i'm pretty sure that this John IS a primary topic. -- SMB99thx XD ( contribs) 10:28, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
@ MarioProtIV: In this kind of Infobox, it is only meant to show the winds when the system attained its peak intensity, and in John's case, its peak intensity was under CPHC's area of responsability, not JMA's one. Also, it would be confusing for the reader to understand that both 1-min and 10-min are reflective to different basins and different since we also apply unnofficial JTWC winds to non-NWS agencies' areas of resopnsabilities. That's why in all mutiple-basin storms, we only add the peak intensity of them, regadless the basin where it achieved it. So infoboxes about storms like Gay, Paka, Oliwa, Dora, Leon–Eline and others don't include winds and pressure of the other basins that they travelled. ABC paulista ( talk) 16:08, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Hurricane John (1994). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:16, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
I am reviewing this 2006 FA as part of the FA sweeps to determine of older FAs still meet WP:WIAFA.
I did not uncover any indications of too close paraphrasing or copyvio or copying within Wikipedia without attribution. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 04:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
I noticed that the distance travelled provided in this text is inaccurate. Does anyone have the original track data that can directly indicate the travel distance?
Besides, does the track of extratropical cyclone count in travel distance? Clearly, we didn't count the lifetime of extratropical form of a cyclone when saying "Hurricane John has a lifetime of 31 days". Ustczyh9 ( talk) 18:46, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
The WMO has announced that it will be looking into whether Freddy has broken the record for the longest-lasting TC. As such, I advise that the lede not be updated till the WMO releases its report. Java Hurricane 13:18, 11 March 2023 (UTC)