![]() | Hunter v Moss has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
June 9, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the decision of the
Court of Appeal of England and Wales in
Hunter v Moss has been called either "sensible" and "fair", or something that could become "stigmatised", "spurious" and doctrinally wrong? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I'm not entirely sure what happens, and why the coat of arms disappears with my changes - please change it. Otherwise, I made some useful changes which it would be good to see back there. Wik idea 08:51, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the additional text, but citation styles have to remain consistent - if you want to add more, add it in the form currently used. Ironholds ( talk) 15:48, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
![]() | Hunter v Moss has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
June 9, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the decision of the
Court of Appeal of England and Wales in
Hunter v Moss has been called either "sensible" and "fair", or something that could become "stigmatised", "spurious" and doctrinally wrong? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I'm not entirely sure what happens, and why the coat of arms disappears with my changes - please change it. Otherwise, I made some useful changes which it would be good to see back there. Wik idea 08:51, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the additional text, but citation styles have to remain consistent - if you want to add more, add it in the form currently used. Ironholds ( talk) 15:48, 23 May 2011 (UTC)