This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Are these ships named after fox hints, as Wikipedia currently claims, or after the Hunt class destroyers, as the official Royal Navy page claims? There is a difference. I think I'd go with the Navy on this one...! Andrewa 04:53, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Why is there always this "1" in the propulsion section?! Greetings Kilon22 ( talk) 14:54, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
HMS Brocklesby is currently (Aug 2016) in refit and one part of this refit is new engines - "the installation of the new fuel-efficient Caterpillar engines, the deep maintenance work on HMS Brocklesby includes replacing control systems and overhauling generators in order to extend her service life for another 15 to 20 years." Refit is due to complete in 2017. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 20.133.0.13 ( talk) 13:10, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Are these ships named after fox hints, as Wikipedia currently claims, or after the Hunt class destroyers, as the official Royal Navy page claims? There is a difference. I think I'd go with the Navy on this one...! Andrewa 04:53, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Why is there always this "1" in the propulsion section?! Greetings Kilon22 ( talk) 14:54, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
HMS Brocklesby is currently (Aug 2016) in refit and one part of this refit is new engines - "the installation of the new fuel-efficient Caterpillar engines, the deep maintenance work on HMS Brocklesby includes replacing control systems and overhauling generators in order to extend her service life for another 15 to 20 years." Refit is due to complete in 2017. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 20.133.0.13 ( talk) 13:10, 24 August 2016 (UTC)