This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hundredth monkey effect article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article and it's accompanying skepticism is just horrific. How can anybody call this trash balanced or neutral? This article is biased and it's more than clear some guy or organization here has a agenda to uphold. --Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.168.153.86 ( talk) 02:53, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not "neutral" on the subject of whether the Earth is flat or quasi-spherical. That would be a completely phony and useless "balance". The first thing examined in such disputes about what to put on a Wikipedia article is, what do the reliable sources support? AnonMoos ( talk) 03:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
can someone bluelink watson's name? i had to go through google search to find the wiki article on the scientist mentioned numerous times here: /info/en/?search=Lyall_Watson
There's other scientist named Watson, who are more famous than this man, so the confusion should be cleared. 2603:7080:CB3F:5032:E954:C643:2787:FF96 ( talk) 22:48, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
The 'hundredth monkey' effect was popularized in the mid-to-late 1970s by Lyall Watson
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hundredth monkey effect article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article and it's accompanying skepticism is just horrific. How can anybody call this trash balanced or neutral? This article is biased and it's more than clear some guy or organization here has a agenda to uphold. --Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.168.153.86 ( talk) 02:53, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not "neutral" on the subject of whether the Earth is flat or quasi-spherical. That would be a completely phony and useless "balance". The first thing examined in such disputes about what to put on a Wikipedia article is, what do the reliable sources support? AnonMoos ( talk) 03:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
can someone bluelink watson's name? i had to go through google search to find the wiki article on the scientist mentioned numerous times here: /info/en/?search=Lyall_Watson
There's other scientist named Watson, who are more famous than this man, so the confusion should be cleared. 2603:7080:CB3F:5032:E954:C643:2787:FF96 ( talk) 22:48, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
The 'hundredth monkey' effect was popularized in the mid-to-late 1970s by Lyall Watson