This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

New York City Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles Websites: Computing Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This section was verbose, confusing, and read something like a promotional piece. I edited for clarity and conciseness. 11 Arlington ( talk) 05:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Is this section even necessary? Do any of the spinoffs even meet WP:NOTABILITY? It's an overwhelming piece that seems to add little substance to the article, and it seems like people are using it as a dumping ground for promoting their own spinoffs. 173.77.151.156 ( talk) 06:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC) reply

I agree. None are notable and most are simply inspired by the original. Rwalker ^talk 15:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Not likely to be independently notable, but worth a mention in the larger article. No Matter How Dark ( talk) 02:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC) reply

• Merge - I think a merge would be appropriate. I created it so somebody could merge or expand it. Thank you for bring it up! CookieMonster755 (talk) 02:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC) :-) reply
• Merge Obviously not notable enough for a standalone article, but could be mentioned here. -- MelanieN ( talk) 17:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC) reply

There's a very strong article argues about Humans of New York blog. Called The Problem With Humans of New York http://gawker.com/the-problem-with-humans-of-new-york-1617812880 . I think it worth looking at it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by M7mood16 ( talk • contribs) 01:02, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

It perfect Matt3fun ( talk) 22:54, 26 August 2021 (UTC) reply