![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment. Further details are available here. |
a
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Mstripling2016.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 22:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 14 December 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Akg5356.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 00:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
I think that the list of links to specific academic programs at the bottom of this article should be deleted, or at least severely pruned. This smacks of astroturf! Anyone have a strong opinion on this? Jtmorgan ( talk) 17:24, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
I am reorganizing some of the recent changes to this article. Listing out things found in a google search does not make the article any easier to understand. Some of these topics may be best handled by a disambiguation page anyhow.
Also, I'm removing some traditional HCI buzzwords like "user-friendly." In general, a lot of HCI seems to be creeping in here. I'm not even sure if we should keep the links to ergonomy and all that traditional pre-HCI stuff. -- Andicat 22:58, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
To anonymous editor: this is in response to your edit summary. please use the discussion page to discuss page content. The nasa definition is just one project... there is a whole research movement that is unrelated to the NASA project that spans several institutions called "human-centered computing." What's confusing here is that the term needs disambiguation page to separate the two uses, which I have just created. -- Andicat 18:14, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Dear "Main Editor" of Human-centered computing
for me, the Human-centered computing is rather a sc. perspective than discipline. No unique theoretical framework exists in this approach. On the other hand every computing is for humans.
Of course, I understand that this term has been used as the names of laboratories, centers, programs or phd theses in concrete sc./tech. domain contexts. The same situation is exactly with the NASA project.
- I would like to ask you : What kind of computing evidently is not, more or less, Human-centered? (- I suggest to create the article Human-centered).
- Your personal opinion (lack of references) on: what is not of interest to Human-Computer Interactions or Man-Machine Interaction (why the reference to this term you canceled?), I do not share ( see also Google).
"...computation will be human-centered. It will be freely available everywhere, like batteries and power sockets, or oxygen in the air we breathe. It will enter the human world, handling our goals and needs and helping us to do more while doing less...".
- It has to be:
"pervasive—it must be everywhere, with every portal reaching into the same information base; embedded—it must live in our world, sensing and affecting it;
nomadic—it must allow users and computations to move around freely, according to their needs; adaptable—it must provide flexibility and spontaneity, in response to changes in user requirements and operating conditions;
powerful, yet efficient—it must free itself from constraints imposed by bounded hardware resources, addressing instead system constraints imposed by user demands and available power or communication bandwidth;
intentional—it must enable people to name services and software objects by intent, for example, "the nearest printer," as opposed to by address;
eternal—it must never shut down or reboot; components may come and go in response to demand, errors, and upgrades, but Oxygen as a whole must be available all the time."
or Google search: "Man-Machine interaction", intelligent
...
Sorry, but your article is written in the traditional buzzword style - I suggest you to improve it asap.
Kind regards.
- anonymous editor -- 192.107.75.158 17:51, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
As a student when seeing this topic in Wikipedia, what I concern is the careers of human-centered computing. Since it is an interdisciplinary field just like Information Science, I think adding this careers part will be much clearer for those scholars who are interested in HCC. Moreover, some universities offer human-centered computing program, such as University of Pittsburgh, Georgia Tech College of Computing and University of Maryland Baltimore County, etc. Therefore, having a clear understanding of the career of human-centered computing is important and useful. Sherry1990Lee ( talk) 02:56, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I am editing this page for a class project with two other editors, and we are planning on making the following changes to this article:
We will be making these changes over the next couple of days, if anyone has any objections to the changes, or sees room for improvements, we are more than open to discussion. This is my first contribution to a wikipedia article and I welcome any feedback! Thanks! Kmogan17 ( talk) 18:12, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment. Further details are available here. |
a
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Mstripling2016.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 22:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 14 December 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Akg5356.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 00:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
I think that the list of links to specific academic programs at the bottom of this article should be deleted, or at least severely pruned. This smacks of astroturf! Anyone have a strong opinion on this? Jtmorgan ( talk) 17:24, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
I am reorganizing some of the recent changes to this article. Listing out things found in a google search does not make the article any easier to understand. Some of these topics may be best handled by a disambiguation page anyhow.
Also, I'm removing some traditional HCI buzzwords like "user-friendly." In general, a lot of HCI seems to be creeping in here. I'm not even sure if we should keep the links to ergonomy and all that traditional pre-HCI stuff. -- Andicat 22:58, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
To anonymous editor: this is in response to your edit summary. please use the discussion page to discuss page content. The nasa definition is just one project... there is a whole research movement that is unrelated to the NASA project that spans several institutions called "human-centered computing." What's confusing here is that the term needs disambiguation page to separate the two uses, which I have just created. -- Andicat 18:14, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Dear "Main Editor" of Human-centered computing
for me, the Human-centered computing is rather a sc. perspective than discipline. No unique theoretical framework exists in this approach. On the other hand every computing is for humans.
Of course, I understand that this term has been used as the names of laboratories, centers, programs or phd theses in concrete sc./tech. domain contexts. The same situation is exactly with the NASA project.
- I would like to ask you : What kind of computing evidently is not, more or less, Human-centered? (- I suggest to create the article Human-centered).
- Your personal opinion (lack of references) on: what is not of interest to Human-Computer Interactions or Man-Machine Interaction (why the reference to this term you canceled?), I do not share ( see also Google).
"...computation will be human-centered. It will be freely available everywhere, like batteries and power sockets, or oxygen in the air we breathe. It will enter the human world, handling our goals and needs and helping us to do more while doing less...".
- It has to be:
"pervasive—it must be everywhere, with every portal reaching into the same information base; embedded—it must live in our world, sensing and affecting it;
nomadic—it must allow users and computations to move around freely, according to their needs; adaptable—it must provide flexibility and spontaneity, in response to changes in user requirements and operating conditions;
powerful, yet efficient—it must free itself from constraints imposed by bounded hardware resources, addressing instead system constraints imposed by user demands and available power or communication bandwidth;
intentional—it must enable people to name services and software objects by intent, for example, "the nearest printer," as opposed to by address;
eternal—it must never shut down or reboot; components may come and go in response to demand, errors, and upgrades, but Oxygen as a whole must be available all the time."
or Google search: "Man-Machine interaction", intelligent
...
Sorry, but your article is written in the traditional buzzword style - I suggest you to improve it asap.
Kind regards.
- anonymous editor -- 192.107.75.158 17:51, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
As a student when seeing this topic in Wikipedia, what I concern is the careers of human-centered computing. Since it is an interdisciplinary field just like Information Science, I think adding this careers part will be much clearer for those scholars who are interested in HCC. Moreover, some universities offer human-centered computing program, such as University of Pittsburgh, Georgia Tech College of Computing and University of Maryland Baltimore County, etc. Therefore, having a clear understanding of the career of human-centered computing is important and useful. Sherry1990Lee ( talk) 02:56, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I am editing this page for a class project with two other editors, and we are planning on making the following changes to this article:
We will be making these changes over the next couple of days, if anyone has any objections to the changes, or sees room for improvements, we are more than open to discussion. This is my first contribution to a wikipedia article and I welcome any feedback! Thanks! Kmogan17 ( talk) 18:12, 17 April 2015 (UTC)