GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Rosguill ( talk · contribs) 00:44, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
I am opening this review now and hope to have most of it done today. I intend to finish this review within the week. I am fluent in Spanish, which I anticipate will help in assessing sources. signed, Rosguill talk 00:44, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Overall, the article is meticulously detailed and sourced. However, it needs some copy editing in order to meet GA criteria. However, I think that these issues could be fixed in short order. In particular, the issues are as follows:
Additional concerns which I don't think bar this article from meeting GA but which should be addressed:
I would suggest that we put this GA on hold until the above issues are addressed. signed, Rosguill talk 01:59, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Issues have been addressed, so I'm happy to confer GA status on the article. There's still some minor organization issues (such as some unclear timelines in the Ecological violations section) and some minor redundancies that could be cleaned up, but they're not so severe that they block GA status in my opinion. If you intend to further improve the article to try for FA, I would suggest working on improving these aspects of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 03:51, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Rosguill ( talk · contribs) 00:44, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
I am opening this review now and hope to have most of it done today. I intend to finish this review within the week. I am fluent in Spanish, which I anticipate will help in assessing sources. signed, Rosguill talk 00:44, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Overall, the article is meticulously detailed and sourced. However, it needs some copy editing in order to meet GA criteria. However, I think that these issues could be fixed in short order. In particular, the issues are as follows:
Additional concerns which I don't think bar this article from meeting GA but which should be addressed:
I would suggest that we put this GA on hold until the above issues are addressed. signed, Rosguill talk 01:59, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Issues have been addressed, so I'm happy to confer GA status on the article. There's still some minor organization issues (such as some unclear timelines in the Ecological violations section) and some minor redundancies that could be cleaned up, but they're not so severe that they block GA status in my opinion. If you intend to further improve the article to try for FA, I would suggest working on improving these aspects of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 03:51, 13 August 2019 (UTC)