This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Travel and Tourism: Hotels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Hotels. New York City Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Hi. I removed infobox_nrhp from the article as this place is not National Register of Historic Places-listed. I checked National Register of Historic Places listings in Manhattan from 14th to 59th Streets to confirm that it is not in a building listed under another name. Also I believe it is not a contributing building in any NRHP-listed historic district. Please advise if I am incorrect. Assuming not, perhaps infobox_building or perhaps there is a template:infobox_hotel would work for this article? -- doncram ( talk) 13:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC) reply