From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re this I don't see how WP:BURDEN is relevant here. Deprecation is not a blanket ban and we could use this source for a totally non-controversial fact until a better source is found. To remind, per WP:DEPRECATED "[c]itations to deprecated sources should not be removed indiscriminately, and each case should be reviewed separately." Evidently it hasn't been done here. Alaexis ¿question? 19:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC) reply

If there isn't an RS, and there is only a source that is literally deprecated, then it fails the challenge of WP:BURDEN. This is hard Wikipedia policy - David Gerard ( talk) 22:54, 21 April 2021 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re this I don't see how WP:BURDEN is relevant here. Deprecation is not a blanket ban and we could use this source for a totally non-controversial fact until a better source is found. To remind, per WP:DEPRECATED "[c]itations to deprecated sources should not be removed indiscriminately, and each case should be reviewed separately." Evidently it hasn't been done here. Alaexis ¿question? 19:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC) reply

If there isn't an RS, and there is only a source that is literally deprecated, then it fails the challenge of WP:BURDEN. This is hard Wikipedia policy - David Gerard ( talk) 22:54, 21 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook