This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Comedy Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Television: British Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Mid-importance). BBC Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Tasks for WikiProject BBC: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary) Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland NPOV : Criticism of the BBC ( See comments) Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles Other : *Restructure the category Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC Return Dad's Army to a Good article. ( See comments) Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

A fact from Horne & Corden appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 March 2009, and was viewed approximately 5,517 times ( disclaimer) ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that despite attracting the highest ratings ever for a comedy show debut on BBC Three, Horne & Corden was described by one critic as, "about as funny as credit default swaps"? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/March.

As the vast majority of the reviews were negative, it's not right to feature 2 positive and 2 negative. Undue weight is given to the positive. I've added a third negative but really it ought to have more. It's hard to find positive ones about the show but easy to find bad ones. 86.134.92.1 ( talk) 12:38, 17 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Fourth added. 86.134.92.1 ( talk) 12:49, 17 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the extra reviews. ISD ( talk) 12:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC) reply

At the moment, there's a section devoted to the sentence "There are currently talks about a second series." This is completely unnecessary, as the information is already contained in the article intro. I'm going to delete the section, as it's completely irrelevant.
Intendent! ( T • C) 21:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply