This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Homotopy groups of spheres article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 180 days
![]() |
![]() | Homotopy groups of spheres was one of the Mathematics good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article is tagged for lack of sources. Though it has a section of references, it lacks inline citations. The math markup is also a bit rough and probably needs to be converted to LaTeX style due to the MOS:BBB character, and italics not meshing well with superscripts. There are also equations in section headers, which might be good to avoid? -- Beland ( talk) 07:49, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
The color scheme might be improved for easier accessibility compliance for the section 508 requirements and doesn't seem to account for the color blind type tests typical in an United States primary education test 184.185.78.118 ( talk) 03:56, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
The head section of the article mentions that the stable homotopy groups of the sphere have been computed for values of up to 64, while the §History section gives the figure 90, citing a freely-available research paper as a source. Although I have nowhere near the required expertise to examine this source myself, I don't know where the first number of 64 came from, and since there is no accompanying citation I am questioning its credibilty. I choose to put a 'citation needed' tag, and write this topic in case someone knows of a credible source for this figure. If no one manifests any knowledge after some time I will probably replace this 64 with the 90 and add a citation to the aforementioned paper, and update this topic. Tommpouce ( talk) 22:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Homotopy groups of spheres article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 180 days
![]() |
![]() | Homotopy groups of spheres was one of the Mathematics good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article is tagged for lack of sources. Though it has a section of references, it lacks inline citations. The math markup is also a bit rough and probably needs to be converted to LaTeX style due to the MOS:BBB character, and italics not meshing well with superscripts. There are also equations in section headers, which might be good to avoid? -- Beland ( talk) 07:49, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
The color scheme might be improved for easier accessibility compliance for the section 508 requirements and doesn't seem to account for the color blind type tests typical in an United States primary education test 184.185.78.118 ( talk) 03:56, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
The head section of the article mentions that the stable homotopy groups of the sphere have been computed for values of up to 64, while the §History section gives the figure 90, citing a freely-available research paper as a source. Although I have nowhere near the required expertise to examine this source myself, I don't know where the first number of 64 came from, and since there is no accompanying citation I am questioning its credibilty. I choose to put a 'citation needed' tag, and write this topic in case someone knows of a credible source for this figure. If no one manifests any knowledge after some time I will probably replace this 64 with the 90 and add a citation to the aforementioned paper, and update this topic. Tommpouce ( talk) 22:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)