This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
High color article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "High color" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
For anyone who wishes to enhance the article visually, there's a series of image I've uploaded to the Commons:
The thing is, I don't know how to incorporate it into the articles, because 1) I don't know how to fit the images, even as thumbnails, without wreaking havoc on the page layout, and 2) when presented as thumbnails, the scaling resamples the images, thereby rendering them useless for the colour depth demonstration unless the reader follows the links to the full-sized images. -- Shlomi Tal ☜ 20:31, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey, I realize that this is not exactly the forum for this question, but I am looking for a relatively obscure answer that no one has been able to help me with so far. I'm trying to make stimulus for a psych experiment using CIE space, so I made it in photoshop with LAB color, a CIE space, but I can't save it as anything but a Tiff which most other applications won't load. I can save it as an 8-bit LAB color tiff, which will sort-of load, or a 16-bit RGB color .PNG file, which will load. The problem is that the two look very different, and I dont know which is closer to the true 16-bit LAB color. Any ideas? thanks and sorry for posting a somewhat irrelevant question here.
Does anyone know how the 8 bit colour values are packed into the 5/6 bits? The simplest method seems to be to just remove the 3/2 lsbs. -- Dean Earley 12:54, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Dean:
Our amps go to 11. 210.84.60.22 10:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
What is the point of the graphic?
What relevance does the caption have to this article? ("Human eyes are more sensitive to green light. The greens are easier to see than the reds, and the blues are almost impossible to see.")
Assuming some relevance, what does "the blues are almost impossible to see" mean? I can see the blue in the graphic fine.
Or is all this simply "plausible vandalism"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.192.31.130 ( talk) 19:06, August 28, 2007 (UTC)
I can see the blue in the graphic fine too. What is written in this article is incorrect. the blues are possible to see easily. That's why you're right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orhosh ( talk • contribs) 17:29, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Avoid self-reference states that articles should avoid assuming that the article is being read on a screen, as this one does. I suggest being more vague and saying something like "this demonstration may not work if the colors in the image have not been correctly preserved". Dcoetzee 22:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Some people have sensitive eyes to blue light more than average, so for them it is not next to impossible to see blue light. In addition, I think that's true for almost everyone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orhosh ( talk • contribs) 16:59, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
What the heck is this? I know RGB, and RGBA, and both of those are covered in the article behind the RGBAX hyperlink ... but not RGBAX itself. What's the X for? 193.63.174.211 ( talk) 13:48, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
The reason I added the template is because the section below it appears to be conflating how much each component contributes to the perceived brightness of the color with to what degree one is able to distinguish colors in which these are varied. See http://www.poynton.com/notes/colour_and_gamma/ColorFAQ.html#RTFToC10 -- Dissident ( Talk) 21:32, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on High color. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:15, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
"Because of this, the color RGB (40, 40, 40) will have a slight purple (magenta) tinge when displayed in 16 bits" Should it actually be more greenish, since the green channel will have higher value (5, 10, 5)?
NorthsteelL ( talk) 02:08, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
High color article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "High color" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
For anyone who wishes to enhance the article visually, there's a series of image I've uploaded to the Commons:
The thing is, I don't know how to incorporate it into the articles, because 1) I don't know how to fit the images, even as thumbnails, without wreaking havoc on the page layout, and 2) when presented as thumbnails, the scaling resamples the images, thereby rendering them useless for the colour depth demonstration unless the reader follows the links to the full-sized images. -- Shlomi Tal ☜ 20:31, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey, I realize that this is not exactly the forum for this question, but I am looking for a relatively obscure answer that no one has been able to help me with so far. I'm trying to make stimulus for a psych experiment using CIE space, so I made it in photoshop with LAB color, a CIE space, but I can't save it as anything but a Tiff which most other applications won't load. I can save it as an 8-bit LAB color tiff, which will sort-of load, or a 16-bit RGB color .PNG file, which will load. The problem is that the two look very different, and I dont know which is closer to the true 16-bit LAB color. Any ideas? thanks and sorry for posting a somewhat irrelevant question here.
Does anyone know how the 8 bit colour values are packed into the 5/6 bits? The simplest method seems to be to just remove the 3/2 lsbs. -- Dean Earley 12:54, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Dean:
Our amps go to 11. 210.84.60.22 10:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
What is the point of the graphic?
What relevance does the caption have to this article? ("Human eyes are more sensitive to green light. The greens are easier to see than the reds, and the blues are almost impossible to see.")
Assuming some relevance, what does "the blues are almost impossible to see" mean? I can see the blue in the graphic fine.
Or is all this simply "plausible vandalism"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.192.31.130 ( talk) 19:06, August 28, 2007 (UTC)
I can see the blue in the graphic fine too. What is written in this article is incorrect. the blues are possible to see easily. That's why you're right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orhosh ( talk • contribs) 17:29, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Avoid self-reference states that articles should avoid assuming that the article is being read on a screen, as this one does. I suggest being more vague and saying something like "this demonstration may not work if the colors in the image have not been correctly preserved". Dcoetzee 22:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Some people have sensitive eyes to blue light more than average, so for them it is not next to impossible to see blue light. In addition, I think that's true for almost everyone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orhosh ( talk • contribs) 16:59, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
What the heck is this? I know RGB, and RGBA, and both of those are covered in the article behind the RGBAX hyperlink ... but not RGBAX itself. What's the X for? 193.63.174.211 ( talk) 13:48, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
The reason I added the template is because the section below it appears to be conflating how much each component contributes to the perceived brightness of the color with to what degree one is able to distinguish colors in which these are varied. See http://www.poynton.com/notes/colour_and_gamma/ColorFAQ.html#RTFToC10 -- Dissident ( Talk) 21:32, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on High color. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:15, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
"Because of this, the color RGB (40, 40, 40) will have a slight purple (magenta) tinge when displayed in 16 bits" Should it actually be more greenish, since the green channel will have higher value (5, 10, 5)?
NorthsteelL ( talk) 02:08, 9 November 2018 (UTC)