This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Buddhism Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Tibet High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

i wonder if my signature works!

B9 hummingbird hovering ^{( talk • contribs)} 11:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC) reply

I am going to remove the image of Vajrakilaya for obvious reasons. Also, I think we should have sources other than those form the NKT. Jmlee369 02:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC) reply

 ---- what's the obvious reason?  surely not copyright?  the reason isn't obvious once you remove the image, even if it was before.

Although I've seen his name used as a synonym for heruka, I don't think this is entirely correct. Although he is of course a heruka, there are other herukas as well. Sylvain1972 20:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)