This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Henry L. Roediger III article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I feel like this article is long enough to warrant its stub status to be removed. Does that seem reasonable? also, how do I go about doing that? Daronsen ( talk) 01:45, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
The page has been tagged as relying on primary sources and as being on a subject of questionable notability. Roediger definitely meets the wikipedia criteria for notability of academics. As for the primary sources, it is true that Roediger is an author on a number of the references, but this is because the text is referring directly to the results of his research. Even still, these studies have been peer reviewed and published. Other than his research, I have referenced his Vitae, though I feel that this is permissible given that this document comes from the Washington University website Daronsen ( talk) 09:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
I disagree that Roediger rose to prominence for his work on the reliability of eyewitness testimony. Is there a particular reference that you were referring to? Daronsen ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:03, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Look at this edit.
Page ranges, like 10–17, and things like Deese–Roeder–McDermott, require an en-dash, not a hyphen.
One does not capitalize an initial letter merely because it's in a section heading.
This is really basic stuff, found in WP:MOS. Michael Hardy ( talk) 15:19, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Victoria University of Wellington supported by WikiProject Psychology and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on
16:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Henry L. Roediger III article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I feel like this article is long enough to warrant its stub status to be removed. Does that seem reasonable? also, how do I go about doing that? Daronsen ( talk) 01:45, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
The page has been tagged as relying on primary sources and as being on a subject of questionable notability. Roediger definitely meets the wikipedia criteria for notability of academics. As for the primary sources, it is true that Roediger is an author on a number of the references, but this is because the text is referring directly to the results of his research. Even still, these studies have been peer reviewed and published. Other than his research, I have referenced his Vitae, though I feel that this is permissible given that this document comes from the Washington University website Daronsen ( talk) 09:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
I disagree that Roediger rose to prominence for his work on the reliability of eyewitness testimony. Is there a particular reference that you were referring to? Daronsen ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:03, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Look at this edit.
Page ranges, like 10–17, and things like Deese–Roeder–McDermott, require an en-dash, not a hyphen.
One does not capitalize an initial letter merely because it's in a section heading.
This is really basic stuff, found in WP:MOS. Michael Hardy ( talk) 15:19, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Victoria University of Wellington supported by WikiProject Psychology and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on
16:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC)