This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Firearms Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deleted "Considering the anti-gun policies of the Clinton administration, it's amazing that any of these rifles were able to get into the U.S. at all during the Clinton years," as it does not conform to a neutral POV. -- DOHC Holiday 13:37, 6 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Yes it does. It is not POV to state that the Clinton Administration's policies were anti-gun. The fact that calling the Clinton Administration "anti-gun" is non-favourable does not make it POV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.69.247.69 ( talk) 23:25, 5 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I have deleted a couple of citations to HKPRO.com. It is not a reliable source for Wikipedia articles because its articles are anonymously posted and there's no discernible editorial review process. See WP:V for general rules, and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Firearms#HKPRO/ hkpro.com for a specific discussion of this source. Rezin ( talk) 00:04, 31 December 2014 (UTC) reply