Harlem riot of 1943 has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 9, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
A fact from Harlem riot of 1943 appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 16 July 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
I used the references as template but the work is my own and I used it to incorporate into copy I took from the article: Harlem on the subject of the Harlem Riot of 1943.
The text is mostly copy / pasted verbatim from http://socyberty.com/history/new-york-city-riot-of-1943/ and otherwise only barely paraphrased and still in infringement. No non-infringing version to revert to. MLauba ( talk) 13:28, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
To any African American, Latino or other interested party. After looking at this person's user page it is quite clear that MLauba has issues with ethnic minorities. They are a Rules lawyer who is using their position to censure articles that don't adhere to their politics.
Like this one.
Racists today no longer where white capes and pointy hats, they just pretend to be upholding truth, honesty and integrity. And that is why there is no longer an article on this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.120.53 ( talk) 15:18, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
\bsocyberty\.com\b
on the local blacklistIf you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:55, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
The first paragraph starts about Robert Bandy, but then talks about someone named Brady twice. I assume that this is a simple spelling error, but I am not familiar with this subject, so could someone with more knowledge fix the error? Omegastar ( talk) 17:24, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: The Rambling Man ( talk · contribs) 20:27, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
I'll take this review.
The Rambling Man (
talk)
20:27, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Comments
That's it for my first pass. The Rambling Man ( talk) 07:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
All good here, not just a well-written article but an interesting one too. Thanks for allowing me to be involved. Promoting. The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
The use of "inquired" in the first paragraph sounds like a biased interpretation of events. Maybe "witnessed a woman's arrest" -- 69.255.12.16 ( talk) 23:20, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Harlem riot of 1943 has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 9, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
A fact from Harlem riot of 1943 appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 16 July 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
I used the references as template but the work is my own and I used it to incorporate into copy I took from the article: Harlem on the subject of the Harlem Riot of 1943.
The text is mostly copy / pasted verbatim from http://socyberty.com/history/new-york-city-riot-of-1943/ and otherwise only barely paraphrased and still in infringement. No non-infringing version to revert to. MLauba ( talk) 13:28, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
To any African American, Latino or other interested party. After looking at this person's user page it is quite clear that MLauba has issues with ethnic minorities. They are a Rules lawyer who is using their position to censure articles that don't adhere to their politics.
Like this one.
Racists today no longer where white capes and pointy hats, they just pretend to be upholding truth, honesty and integrity. And that is why there is no longer an article on this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.120.53 ( talk) 15:18, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
\bsocyberty\.com\b
on the local blacklistIf you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:55, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
The first paragraph starts about Robert Bandy, but then talks about someone named Brady twice. I assume that this is a simple spelling error, but I am not familiar with this subject, so could someone with more knowledge fix the error? Omegastar ( talk) 17:24, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: The Rambling Man ( talk · contribs) 20:27, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
I'll take this review.
The Rambling Man (
talk)
20:27, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Comments
That's it for my first pass. The Rambling Man ( talk) 07:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
All good here, not just a well-written article but an interesting one too. Thanks for allowing me to be involved. Promoting. The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
The use of "inquired" in the first paragraph sounds like a biased interpretation of events. Maybe "witnessed a woman's arrest" -- 69.255.12.16 ( talk) 23:20, 8 January 2017 (UTC)