This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
Just a note that "a sum comprised of an estimated $700 from 20,000,000 TikTok views in a month as of August 2020, averaging to about 3.5 cents per 1,000 views" as stated in the article is definitely outdated info, as over $35,000 in less than a year as more recently stated (see article ref. 125) would be at least a few thousand per month. All I found was the TikTok (again, ref. 125) stating "my TikTok has gotten bigger since then", so if someone knows of more detailed recent figures that might be helpful. Otherwise, I'd suggest taking out this entire piece of info or boiling it down to "3.5 cents per 1,000 views", which I don't see any reason to believe has changed (?). Disturbnce ( talk)
The following sections do not have secondary sources and should either be cited or removed:
The following sections have insufficient sourcing quality for a WP:BLP and should be discussed:
Look, I know that Hank Green gets up to a lot of stuff, but not everything he touches is important enough to go on his personal Wikipedia page. We should really discuss how long we want this article to be, and how it could be improved. theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) ( they/them) 02:02, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
theleekycauldron, I think the Business Insider source should stay. Since there is no consensus for Business Insider's blanket removal, the facts are not overly controversial, and John Green linked to the source in a tweet, it seems fine for this use. I agree the other one is worth excluding, especially since we at least have the Indy Star source. -- Cerebral726 ( talk) 20:00, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
He was arrested at 16 for kidnapping a lemur from the Zoo. 24.250.252.8 ( talk) 18:43, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add in Hanks early life how he stole a lemur from the central Florida Zoo when he was 16.
Evidence: https://twitter.com/hankgreen/status/1544370413232201728?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet HankGreenFan ( talk) 01:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
The news just came out and I forwent checking editing history before seeing that someone editing this page with that information using YouTube as a source had their edit removed because YouTube is considered an unreliable source. I'm sorry for my recklessness.
To avoid starting an editing war, I figure I'd start a discussion here.
While YouTube /is/ unreliable to use as a secondary source, isn't it fine to use the subject (Hank Green) as a self-published source given that he announced it himself here? Per WP:BLPSELFPUB and WP:BLPSPS. Cadenrock1 ( talk) 15:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
@ Strugglehouse Sorry for undoing your crops. In both instances, I found them to be cropped too tight. For the infobox image, some of his hair was cut off, and the current version to me seems like an ideal amount of breathing room. With the photo of them onstage, part of the focus is that they are on stage in this photo, so having more of the background is a positive aspect of it. Cerebral726 ( talk) 15:16, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Is there a reason for no article about the awesome socks club? It seems to merit an article. Sailcalculator ( talk) 19:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
Just a note that "a sum comprised of an estimated $700 from 20,000,000 TikTok views in a month as of August 2020, averaging to about 3.5 cents per 1,000 views" as stated in the article is definitely outdated info, as over $35,000 in less than a year as more recently stated (see article ref. 125) would be at least a few thousand per month. All I found was the TikTok (again, ref. 125) stating "my TikTok has gotten bigger since then", so if someone knows of more detailed recent figures that might be helpful. Otherwise, I'd suggest taking out this entire piece of info or boiling it down to "3.5 cents per 1,000 views", which I don't see any reason to believe has changed (?). Disturbnce ( talk)
The following sections do not have secondary sources and should either be cited or removed:
The following sections have insufficient sourcing quality for a WP:BLP and should be discussed:
Look, I know that Hank Green gets up to a lot of stuff, but not everything he touches is important enough to go on his personal Wikipedia page. We should really discuss how long we want this article to be, and how it could be improved. theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) ( they/them) 02:02, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
theleekycauldron, I think the Business Insider source should stay. Since there is no consensus for Business Insider's blanket removal, the facts are not overly controversial, and John Green linked to the source in a tweet, it seems fine for this use. I agree the other one is worth excluding, especially since we at least have the Indy Star source. -- Cerebral726 ( talk) 20:00, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
He was arrested at 16 for kidnapping a lemur from the Zoo. 24.250.252.8 ( talk) 18:43, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add in Hanks early life how he stole a lemur from the central Florida Zoo when he was 16.
Evidence: https://twitter.com/hankgreen/status/1544370413232201728?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet HankGreenFan ( talk) 01:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
The news just came out and I forwent checking editing history before seeing that someone editing this page with that information using YouTube as a source had their edit removed because YouTube is considered an unreliable source. I'm sorry for my recklessness.
To avoid starting an editing war, I figure I'd start a discussion here.
While YouTube /is/ unreliable to use as a secondary source, isn't it fine to use the subject (Hank Green) as a self-published source given that he announced it himself here? Per WP:BLPSELFPUB and WP:BLPSPS. Cadenrock1 ( talk) 15:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
@ Strugglehouse Sorry for undoing your crops. In both instances, I found them to be cropped too tight. For the infobox image, some of his hair was cut off, and the current version to me seems like an ideal amount of breathing room. With the photo of them onstage, part of the focus is that they are on stage in this photo, so having more of the background is a positive aspect of it. Cerebral726 ( talk) 15:16, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Is there a reason for no article about the awesome socks club? It seems to merit an article. Sailcalculator ( talk) 19:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC)