![]() | Handcream for a Generation has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 29, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Image:Handcream for a Generation cover.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Thebiguglyalien ( talk · contribs) 17:32, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Let's get this review started before it hits its six month anniversary in the queue.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk) 17:32, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
"Slip the Drummer One" includes scratching sounds from Swift.isn't cohesive with the rest of the paragraph, making it feel incomplete. Looking at the sources I spotchecked, the Mitchum source talks a bit about its genre, which is really all it needs. And speaking of genre, the other issues is that the lead still doesn't discuss that aspect of the album, even though the genre experimentation might be the album's defining feature. Those two things are the only things holding this back from good article status in my opinion. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 22:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Prose, grammar, layout, words to watch, and lists are all good. I did some minor copyediting and added a short description. The only issue here is that the lead needs a little work. It leans a bit heavily on background, and another paragraph should probably be written in the lead to summarize the style, composition, and themes, as these currently aren't mentioned there at all. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 18:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
All sources appear to be reliable. Article is comprehensively cited. WP:EARWIG detected no issues. Spot checked the following for plagiarism and accurate summarizing of sources:
"Spectral Mornings" is an 14-minute psychedelic song that channels the 1960s work of Grateful Dead.
The sourcing on this article isn't terrible, but it seems to need a quick one-over where there are multiple sources on a sentence to make sure that they support what they're attached to and that it's clear what supports what. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 19:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Coverage touches on each major aspect, but there are some missing details, particularly regarding composition of individual songs, that could benefit the article. At least some of them should be addressed:
Possible relevance issues:
Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 18:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
No neutrality issues. Article gives a fair analysis of positive and negative reception. No individual's opinion is leaned on too heavily. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 18:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
No issues in edit history or on talk page. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 17:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Three images: two under Creative Commons and one with valid fair use rationale. Images of individuals provide context with a suitable caption. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 17:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Handcream for a Generation has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 29, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Image:Handcream for a Generation cover.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Thebiguglyalien ( talk · contribs) 17:32, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Let's get this review started before it hits its six month anniversary in the queue.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk) 17:32, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
"Slip the Drummer One" includes scratching sounds from Swift.isn't cohesive with the rest of the paragraph, making it feel incomplete. Looking at the sources I spotchecked, the Mitchum source talks a bit about its genre, which is really all it needs. And speaking of genre, the other issues is that the lead still doesn't discuss that aspect of the album, even though the genre experimentation might be the album's defining feature. Those two things are the only things holding this back from good article status in my opinion. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 22:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Prose, grammar, layout, words to watch, and lists are all good. I did some minor copyediting and added a short description. The only issue here is that the lead needs a little work. It leans a bit heavily on background, and another paragraph should probably be written in the lead to summarize the style, composition, and themes, as these currently aren't mentioned there at all. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 18:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
All sources appear to be reliable. Article is comprehensively cited. WP:EARWIG detected no issues. Spot checked the following for plagiarism and accurate summarizing of sources:
"Spectral Mornings" is an 14-minute psychedelic song that channels the 1960s work of Grateful Dead.
The sourcing on this article isn't terrible, but it seems to need a quick one-over where there are multiple sources on a sentence to make sure that they support what they're attached to and that it's clear what supports what. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 19:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Coverage touches on each major aspect, but there are some missing details, particularly regarding composition of individual songs, that could benefit the article. At least some of them should be addressed:
Possible relevance issues:
Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 18:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
No neutrality issues. Article gives a fair analysis of positive and negative reception. No individual's opinion is leaned on too heavily. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 18:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
No issues in edit history or on talk page. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 17:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Three images: two under Creative Commons and one with valid fair use rationale. Images of individuals provide context with a suitable caption. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 17:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)